Mar 31, 2010
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of PRESTIGE FOODS
LIMITED as at 31st March 2010 and also the Profit & Loss Account & Cash
Flow Statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2. We have conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing
standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the Accounting Principles used and significant estimates made
by the management as well as evaluating the overall financial
statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides us a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 as
amended by the Companies (Auditors report) Amendment order, 2004
issued by the Central Government in terms of Sub-Section (4A) of the
Section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956and on the basis of such checks
as we considered appropripriates and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order to the extant
applicable to the company.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(I) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of accounts, as required by law have
been kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
(iii) The Balance Sheet .Profit & Loss account and Cash Flow statement,
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss account and Cash
Flow statement dealt with by this report, comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in Sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of the written representations received from the
directors, as on 31 st March 2010, and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors of the company is
disqualified as on 31st March, 2010 from being appointed as director in
terms of clause (g) of Sub-section (1) of Section 274 of the Companies
Act, 1956;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us and subject to:
I. Note No. 2(a),(c) & 4(a) & (d) regarding non- provisions in respect
of Central Excise, Commercial Tax and other Contingent liabilities
ii. Note No. 4(b) & (c) regarding non provision of Commercial Tax
Central Sales Tax & Entry Tax Liabilities from 1995-96 to 2002-03 of
Rs.214.75 Lacs
iii. Note No. 8 regarding non-provisions of aggregate interest of
Rs.1.82 Lacs (previous year Rs.1.82 Lacs) on loans and advances given
by the Company.
iv. Note No.9 In respect of utilization of funds and pending
compliances u/s 205Aof the Companies Act 1956
v. Note No.11 (b) regarding Non Accounting of Deferred Tax Assets.
vi. Note No.13 regarding accounts of the Company prepared On going
concern basis.
vli. Note No.15 regarding remuneration to directors, subject to
approval of Central Govt.
We further report that, without considering items mentioned at
(i),(iv), [v) (vi) & (vii) above the effect of which is not there, had
the observations made by us in [ii) & (iii] above paragraphs been
considered the Loss for the year would have been Rs.125.79 Lacs as
against the reported Profit of Rs.87.14 Lacs. The debit balance u.
Hrofit and Loss Account would have been Rs.4679 Lacs as against
reported figure of Rs.4466 Lacs and the said accounts together with
notes thereon and statement on Significant Accounting Policies give in
the prescribed manner the information required by the Companies Act,
1956 and also give respectively true and fair view in conformity with
the Accounting Principles generally accepted in India:
(i) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31 st March, 2010
(ii) In the case of Profit & Loss Account of the Profit for the year
ended on that date; and
(iii) In the case of Cash Flow Statement of the Cash Flows for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS REPORT [Referred to in paragraph (3) thereof]
1.a)The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets on the
basis of available information.
b) As explained to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified
by the management during the year in a phased periodical manner, which
in our opinion is reasonable, having regard to size of the Company and
nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
c) In our opinion, the company has not sold/ disposed off any
significant portion of fixed assets during the year.
2. a) As explained to us, inventories have been physically verified by
the management at regular intervals during the year. The management has
confirmed the stocks lying at ports.
b)ln our opinion and according to the information and explanations
Given to us, the procedures of physical verification of Inventories
followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to
size of the Company and nature of its business.
c)The Company has maintained proper records of inventories. As
explained to us, there were no material discrepancies noticed on
physical verification of inventory as compared to the book records, and
they have been properly dealt with, in the books of account.
3. a) The Company has not granted any loans/advances to Companies,
Firms Or other parties listed in the register, maintained u/s 301 of
the Companies Act 1956, except loans/advances of
Rs.18.15 Lacs (Previous year Rs.18.12 Lacs) given to three
companies/firms in which some of the members are interested. Interests
on such loans and advances calculated at Rs.1.82 Lacs (Previous year
Rs.1.81 lacs) have not been provided during the year. In respect of
loans & advances of Rs.NIL (Previous year Rs.40.46 Lacs) in the nature
of loans given by the company in earlier year, interest thereon Rs.NIL
Lacs (Previous year Rs.4.05 Lacs) have not been provided during the
year (Refer Note No.8) However, these loans are considered good but the
Schedule of repayment is not fixed.
b)The Company has taken loans of Rs.367.51 Lacs (Previous year
Rs.367.51 Lacs) from two companies (including subsidiary)/ firms in
which some of the Directors are interested at free of interest and
prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the Company including
Companies or firms or other parties listed in the Register maintained
U/s.301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
c) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the rate of interest, wherever applicable and other terms
and conditions are not prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the
company.
d) In respect of loans & advances granted by the company to others,
loans & advances are interest free and repayable on demand. In respect
of loans taken by the Company, the interest payments and the principal
amount is payable on demand.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business for purchase of inventory, fixed assets and with regard to the
sale of goods. During the course of our audit, we have not observed any
continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal controls.
5. a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we are
of the opinion that the particulars of the transactions that need to be
entered into the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 have been so entered.
b)ln our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of rupees five lacs in respect of any
party during the year have been made at prices which are reasonable
having regard to prevailing market price at relevant time.
6. The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during
the year within the meaning of section 58-Aof the Companies Act, 1956
and rules framed there under, except inter-corporate deposits from
members, promoters & subsidiary company and other trade deposits, which
are exempt deposits. No order by the Company Law Board ûor National
Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any other court
oranyotherTribunal has been passed.
7. The Company has its internal control system. In our opinion, its
internal control system involves reasonable internal checking of
financial and other records, which is considered adequate in the
circumstances. However, internal audit functions needs to be
strengthened.
8. We have broadly reviewed the Books of
Account maintained by the Company, pursuant to the rules made by the
Central Government for maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)
(d) of the Companies Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie,
the prescribed accounts and records have been made and maintained. We
have not, however, made a detailed examination of the said records,
with a view to determine their accuracy or completeness.
9. a) According to the information and explanations given to us and the
records of the Company examined by us, in our opinion, undisputed
statutory dues including Provident fund, investor education and
protection fund, Employees State Insurance, Income-Tax, Sales-tax,
wealth tax, custom duty, Excise duty, service tax, cess and other
material statutory dues as may be applicable to it have been generally
regularly deposited with a slight delay in a few cases to the
appropriate authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us,
undisputed amounts of following statutory dues were in arrears as at 31
st March, 2010 for a period of more than six months from the date it
became payable.
Sr.No Amount in Lacs
1. EmployeesProvident fund (ContractorsContribution) 0.10
2. Entry Tax 104.49
3. Commercial Tax /Value Added Tax 205.54
4. Central Sales Tax 42.88
5. Investor education and protection fund
(Unclaimed Dividend & Unclaimed Interest on
Debenture) (Net) 6.96
c) According to the information and explanations given to us, and the
records of the Company examined by us, the particulars of Commercial
Tax & Excise duty dues as at 31st March, 2010 which have not been
deposited on account of disputes pending, are as under: -
Name of Nature of disputed dues Amount In Lacs
the Statute pending
Commercial Due to non-submission 64.37
Tax & Central of forms,
Sales Tax, classification dispute
Entry Tax etc. of Unit No. I
The Central Excise Duty leviable 18.90
Excise Act, on process of
1994 fabrication And
assembling of certain
Items
Employees Delay in Payment of 03.01
Provident Penalty Damages
Fund& & Interest under
Miscellaneous Provident fund
Provision
Act, 1952
Name of the Statue pending Period to Forum where
Which the dispute is
amount
relates
Commercial
Tax & Central
Sales Tax,
EntryTax 2003-04 to Deputy
2004-05 Commissioner
Appeal/Revision
The Central
Excise Act,
1994 1994-95 Commissioner of
Central Excise &
Custom Appeal
Employees
Provident
Fund&
Miscellaneous
Provision
Act, 1952 1991 to Central Board of
2002 Trustee New
Delhi
10. (a) In our opinion the accumulated losses of the company are more
than fifty percent of its net worth. The Company has earned cash profit
during the financial year covered by our audit and the cash profit in
the immediately preceding financial year.
(b) According to the information provided by the Company, the Company
is a Sick Industrial company within the meaning of section 3(1 )(o)of
the Sick Industrial Companies Special Provisions Act 1985 and is duly
registered with BIFR.
11. based on our Audit procedures and according to the information and
explanation given to us, we are of the opinion that the Company has not
defaulted in the repayment of the dues to financial institutions and
banks.
12. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, no loans and advances have been granted by the Company on
the basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
13. In our opinion, the Company is not a chit fund or nidhi/mutual
benefit fund/ society. Therefore, clause 4(xiii) of the Companies
(Auditors Report) order 2003 is not applicable to the Company.
14. In our opinion, the Company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4(xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the Company.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us, company
has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from the banks or
financial institutions
16. In our opinion and according to the information & explanations
given to us the Company has not taken any term loan during they6ar.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the Company, we report
that funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long-term
investment to the extent of Rs.0.16 Lacs (previous year 5.83 Lacs) for
addition made to fix Assets.
18. During the year, the Company has not made any preferential
allotment of shares to parties and companies covered in the Register
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
19. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us the company has not issued any debentures during the year.
20. The Company has not raised any money by Public Issue during the
year.
21. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported
during the yearthat causes the financial statements to be materially
misstated.
For M/s. M. Mehta & Co. For M/s. S.M. Jain & Co.
Chartered Accountants Chartered Accountants
CA. P.R. Bandi CA. S.M. Jain
Partner Partner
M.No.F: 016402 M.No. F: 007236
FRN:000957C FRN - 004252C
Indore
July 30,2010
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article