Jun 30, 2012
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s THAPAR ISPAT LIMITED
as at 30th June, 2012 and the Profit & Loss Account and also .the cash
flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the company''s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
01. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. These standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit
includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
02. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 and
Companies (Auditors Reports)(Amendment ) order 2004 issued by the
Central Government of India in terms of sub-section 4(A) Section 227 of
the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
03. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above , we
report that :
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanation, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose or our
audit.
(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have
been kept by the company so for as appears from our examination of such
books.
(c) The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and cash flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and
cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on 30th June, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the Directors other than Nominee Director of PSIDC
are prima facie as on 30th June, 2011, disqualified from being
appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section(I) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements read
together with the Significant Accounting policies and other notes
thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, and
in the manner so required and give a true & fair view in conformity
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet of the State of affairs of the
company as at 30th June, 2012 and:
(ii) In the Case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the profit/loss for
the year ended on that date: and
(iii) In the case of the cash flow state of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT
(REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF OUR REPORT OF EVEN DATE ON THE
STATEEMNT OF ACCOUNTS FOR M/s. THAPAR ISPAT LIMITED AS AT AND FOR THE
YEAR ENDED 30th JUNE, 2012)
1.a) The Company has maintained proper Vecords showing full particulars
including quantitative details and situation of its fixed assets.
b) All Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management
during the year. No material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
c) The Company did not dispose off a substantial part of fixed assets
during the year.
2. a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by the
management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies notices on verification between the physical stocks and
the books records were not material and were properly dealt with in the
books of accounts.
3. a) The company has not granted loans secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the registered maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act 1956. As the Company has not
granted any loan secured or unsecured, to the parties listed in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956,
paragraph (iii)(a),(b),(c''),&(d) of order are not applicable.
b) The company has not taken loans secured or unsecured from companies,
firm or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Companies Act 1956 as such paragraph (iii)(e),(f) & (g) of
the order are not applicable.
4. In our opinion and recording to the information and explanation
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business, with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with
regard to the sale of goods. During the course of our audit, we have
not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in
internal controls.
5. There are no transaction that need to be entered into the register
maintained under section 301 of the companies Act, 1956.
6. According to information & explanation given to us, the company has
not accepted any new deposits as per Section 58 A of the Companies Act,
1956.
7. In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209{l)(d) of the Companies
Act,1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained. However we have not
made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to
determine whether they are accurate or complete.
9. a) According to information and explanation given to us, the company
has been regular in depositing with appropriate authorities undisputed
statutory dues including provident fund, employee''s state insurance,
income tax, wealth tax, service tax, sale tax, customs duty, excise
duty, and cess and other material statutory dues applicable to it.
b) According to information and explanation given to us, no undisputed
amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sale tax, service
tax, customs duty, excise duty, and cess were in arrears, as at 30l
June, 2012 for period of more than six months from the date they become
payable.
c) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
following are the particular of dues on account of income tax, wealth
tax, service tax, sale tax, customs duty, excise duty, and cess which
have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
Name of the Nature of
dues Amount Period to
which Forum where dispute
statutory (Rs. amount
relating pending
in Lacs)
Indian
Custom, Custom Duty 139.50 1999-2000 Joint Director
General
Act Interest & 2.00 2006-2007 of Foreign Trade,
Penalty New Delhi
However liability in this regard has been provided.
10. The accumulated loss of the Company as at 30th June, 2012is not
less than Fifty percent of its net worth. The Company has incurred cash
losses for the year ended 30th June, 2012 and also in the immediately
proceeding year.
11. According to information and explanations given to us and on the
basis on examination of books of accounts the company has defaulted in
repayment of dues of all the banks and financial institution. The
information is as under:-
Name of Bank/Institutions Amount in Default
(Rs.Lacs) Period of
Default
Punjab & Sind Bank 95.88 1999-2000
Oriental Bank of Commerce 85.98 1999-2000
I.I.B.I. 1608.59 1999-2000
P.S.I.D.C. 4281.64 1999-2000
12. According to the information and explanations given to us the
company has not granted any loans and advance on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares and other securities. Accordingly clause
4(XII) of the order is not applicable.
13. In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual
benefit fond/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of
the companies (Auditors Report) order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
14. According to the information and explanations given to us the
company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures
and other investments. Accordingly , the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of
the Companies (Auditors Report) order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
15. In our opinion, and according to information and explanations
given to us the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by
others from banks or financial institutions.
16. In our opinion, and according to information and explanations
given to us the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which
they were raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long
term investment except permanent working capital.
18. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Act during the year.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the year covered by our audit report, the company has not issued any
debentures.
20. There has not been any public issue during the year.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
22. The company is a Sick Industrial Company within the meaning of
clause (o) of section (3) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special
Provisions) Act, 1985. The Company has reported that it has filed
reference based on account for the year 2000-01 to 2010-11 and the same
have been reportedly rejected by Honble BIFR and appeal against order
of BIFR is pending before AAIFR. The reference based on accounts of
30.06.2010 has been registered with Hon''ble BIFR and hearing of the
same is going on.
For VIMAL DIXIT & ASSOCIATES
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Sd/-
(Vimal Kant Dixit)
PARTNER
Place: Ludhiana
Date : 1/12/2012 Membership No: 078201
Jun 30, 2010
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s THAPAR ISPAT LIMITED
as at 30th June, 2010 and the Profit & Loss Account and also the cash
flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
01. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. These standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit
includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
02. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 and
Companies (Auditors Reports)(Amendment) order 2004 issued by the
Central Government of India in terms of sub-section 4(A) Section 227 of
the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
03. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above , we
report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanation, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose or our
audit.
(b) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by law have
been kept by the company so for as appears from our examination of such
books.
(c) The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and cash flow statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account.
(d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and
cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on 30th June, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the Directors other than Nominee Director of PSIDC
are prima facie as on 30th June, 2010, disqualified from being
appointed as a Director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section(I) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
(f) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said financial statements read
together with the Significant Accounting policies and other notes
thereon give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, and
in the manner so required and give a true & fair view in conformity
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet of the State of affairs of the
company as at 30th June, 2010 and:
(ii) In the Case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the profit/loss for
the year ended on that date: and
(iii) In the case of the cash flow state of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS REPORT (REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF OUR REPORT
OF EVEN DATE ON THE STATEEMNT OF ACCOUNTS FOR M/s. THAPAR ISPAT LIMITED
AS AT AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30th JUNE, 2010)
1. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of its fixed
assets.
b) All Fixed assets have been physically verified by the management
during the year. No material discrepancies were noticed on such
verification.
c) The Company did not dispose off a substantial part of fixed assets
during the year.
2. a) The inventory has been physically verified during the year by
the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification is
reasonable.
b) The procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies notices on verification between the physical stocks and
the books records were not material and were properly dealt with in the
books of accounts.
3. a) The company has not granted loans secured or unsecured to
companies, firms or other parties covered in the registered maintained
under Section 301 of the Companies Act 1956. As the Company has not
granted any loan secured or unsecured, to the parties listed in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956,
paragraph (iii)(a),(b),(c), & (d) of order are not applicable.
b) The company has not taken loans secured or unsecured from companies,
firm or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section
301 of the Companies Act 1956 as such paragraph (iii)(e),(f) & (g) of
the order are not applicable.
4. In our opinion and recording to the information and explanation
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the Company and the nature of its
business, with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with
regard to the sale of goods. During the course of our audit, we have
not observed any continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in
internal controls.
5. There are no transaction that need to be entered into the register
maintained under section 301 of the companies Act, 1956.
6. According to information & explanation given to us, the company has
not accepted any new deposits as per Section 58 A of the Companies Act,
1956.
7. In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of account maintained by the
company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(l)(d) of the Companies
Act,1956 and we are of the opinion that prima facie the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained. However we have not
made a detailed examination of the said records with a view to
determine whether they are accurate or complete.
9. a) According to information and explanation given to us, the
company has been regular in depositing with appropriate authorities
undisputed statutory dues including provident fund, employees state
insurance, income tax, wealth tax, service tax, sale tax, customs duty,
excise duty, and cess and other material statutory dues applicable to
it.
b) According to information and explanation given to us, no undisputed
amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sale tax, service
tax, customs duty, excise duty, and cess were in arrears, as at 30th
June, 2010 for period of more than six months from the date they become
payable.
c) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
following are the particular of dues on account of income tax, wealth
tax, service tax, sale tax, customs duty, excise duty, and cess which
have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
Name of the Nature of
dues Amount Period to which Forum where
dispute
statutory (Rs. amount relating pending
in Lacs)
Indian Custom, Custom Duty 139.50 1999-2000 Joint Director
General
Act Interest & 2.00 2006-2007 of Foreign Trade,
Penalty New Delhi
However liability in this regard has been provided.
10. The accumulated loss of the Company as at 30th June, 2010 is not
less than Fifty percent of its net worth. The Company has incurred cash
losses for the year ended 30th June, 2010 and also in the immediately
proceeding year.
11. According to information and explanations given to us and on the
basis on examination of books of accounts the company has defaulted in
repayment of dues of all the banks and financial institution. The
information is as under:-
Name of Bank/
Institutions Amount in Default(Rs.Lacs) Period of Default
Punjab & Sind Bank 95.88 1999-2000
Oriental Bank of Commerce 85.98 1999-2000
U.B.I. 1608.59 1999-2000
P.S.I.D.C. 4281.64 1999-2000
12. According to the information and explanations given to us the
company has not granted any loans and advance on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares and other securities. Accordingly clause
4(XII) of the order is not applicable.
13. In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi / mutual
benefit fond/society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of
the companies (Auditors Report) order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
14. According to the information and explanations given to us the
company is not dealing in or trading in shares, securities, debentures
and other investments. Accordingly , the provisions of clause 4(xiv) of
the Companies (Auditors Report) order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
15. In our opinion, and according to information and explanations
given to us the company has not given guarantees for loans taken by
others from banks or financial institutions.
16. In our opinion, and according to information and explanations
given to us the term loans have been applied for the purpose for which
they were raised.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and on
an overall examination of the balance sheet of the company, we report
that the no funds raised on short-term basis have been used for long
term investment except permanent working capital.
18. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Act during the year.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the year covered by our audit report, the company has not issued any
debentures.
20. There has not been any public issue during the year.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us, no
fraud on or by the company has been noticed or reported during the
course of our audit.
22. The company is a Sick Industrial Company within the meaning of
clause (o) of section (3) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special
Provisions) Act, 1985. The Company has reported that it has filed
reference based on account for the year 2000-01 to 2008-09 and the same
have been reportedly rejected by Honble BIFR and appeal against order
of BIFR is pending before AAIFR.
For VIMAL DIXIT & ASSOCIATES
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Sd/-
PARTNER
Place: Ludhiana
Date : 03/12/2010
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article