Teknomin Aqua Exports(I) Ltd. के अकाउंट के लिये नोट

Mar 31, 2014

S.No. Case No.

01. 12013/19/2004 ADJ/AC Dt.09.07.2004 Penalty imposed Rs.2.00 lacs by the Dev. Commissioner, VSEZ, VSP.

Stage

Appeal filed before Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

02. C/Appeal No. 212/2000 Dt.05.07.2000 Appeal rejected on the demand of for Rs. 17.44 lacs of CESTAT, Bangalore.

Dues paid as per stay order granted & Appeal filed pending High Court ofAndhra Pradesh, Hyderabad recovery

03. Appeal No. E/Mise 27/07, Dated : 9-5-2007 field before CESTAT, Banglore on the orders issued by commissioner of appeals, Guntur on the tax imposed of Rs. 190 lacs notices of Asll. Commissioner - C.E, Nellore.

Appeal field before CESTAT, Bangolore& Stay Granted

04 Appeal No. 21/2003, Dated: 18-12-2003 in the matter of Buy-back of MPEDA Capital Investment of Rs. 16 lacs as per financial agreement dt: 31-3-1993

Case is in Pendin§ before H''gh Court of Kerala, Ernakulam.

05. Bombay stock exchange Ref No-DCS/ COMP/TO7TB/252/2010-11 Dated p 14-09-2011 Payment of Re-Instalament fee of Rs 12.50 Laks Plus Service tax @ 12.36%

Pending

6. Expenditure in Foreign Currency: - Nil -

7. Capital committments as on 31-03-2014: - Ni1 -

8. The details of the Managerial Remuneration paid are as follows:-Nil-

9. There are no employees drawing salary of Rs.2,00,000/- or more p.m. or Rs.24,00,000/- or more per year or part thereof.

11 .Paises are rounded off to nearest Rupee.

12.Figures were re-grouped wherever necessary.

13.Confirmation of balances are not obtained for sundry debtors, creditors and advances made.

---

Mar 31, 2013

1. In the matter of compliance with the Accounting Standard "AS-22, Accounting for Taxes on Income" issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), it is to state that since the Company has unabsorbed losses to the tune of Rs. 492.19 lacs and further it is incurring continuous losses, there is very much uncertain in availability of future taxable income against which the deferred tax assets can be realised. As such the provision for deferred tax assets is not made.

2. The Calls-in-arrear account amounting to Rs.1,49,500/- in respect of allotment money receivable is subject to reconciliation. Interest received on Payment of Calls-in-arrears is accounted for on actual receipt basis.

3. Depreciation was provided on W.D. V basis at the rates prescribed as per the schedule XIV of the companies Act, 1956.

4. Expenditure in Foreign Currency: - Nil -

5 Capital committments as on 31-03-2013: - Ni 1 -

6. The details of the Managerial Remuneration paid are as follows:-Nil-

7. There are no employees drawing salary of Rs.2,00,000/- or more p.m. or Rs.24,00,000/- or more per year or part thereof.

8. Paises are rounded off to nearest Rupee.

9. Figures were re-grouped wherever necessary.

10. Confirmation of balances are not obtained for sundry debtors, creditors and advances made.

---

Mar 31, 2012

1. In the matter of compliance with the Accounting Standard "AS-22, Accounting for Taxes on Income" issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), it is to state that since the Company has unabsorbed losses to the tune of Rs. 484.71 lacs and further it is incurring continuous losses, there is very much uncertain in availability of future taxable income against which the deferred tax assets can be realised. As such the provision for deferred tax assets is not made.

2. The Calls-in-arrear account amounting to Rs. 1,49,500/- in respect of allotment money receivable is subject to reconciliation. Interest received on Payment of Calls-in-arrears is accounted for on actual receipt basis.

3. Depreciation was provided on W.D.V basis at the rates prescribed as per the schedule XIV of the companies Act, 1956.

4. Contingent Liability:

Sl. Case Stage No.

01. C/Appeal No. 212/2000 Dt. 05.07.2000 Appeal pending High Appeal rejected on the demand of Court ofAndhra Rs. 17.44 lacs of CESTAT, Bangalore Pradesh Hyderabad for recovery & Stay granted

02. Appeal No. E/Mise 27/07 & Eisty/259/2006 Appeal field before inE/374/2006, Dated : 9-5-2007 field CESTAT, Bangalore & before CESTAT, Bangalore on the orders Stay Granted, case issued by commissioner of appeals, pending in Tribunal Guntur on the tax imposed of Rs. 190 - Bangalore lacs notices of Asll. Commissioner - C.E, Nellore.

03. Appeal No. 21/2003, Dated : 18-12-2003 Case is in pending in the matter of Buy-back of MPEDA before High Court of Capital Investment of Rs. 16 lacs as Kerala, Ernakulam. per financial agreement dt : 31-3-1993, Arbitation appeal Ref: no-3/07/2012 A1-Ho Regd-Letter 21/2003 in dt. 23-07-2012. for one settlement Honourable High Received. Court Ernakulam

04. Bombay stock exchange Ref No-DCS/ Pending COMP/OT/TB/252/2010-11 Dated 14-09-2011 Payment of Re-Installment fee of Rs. 2.50 Lakhs Plus Service tax @ 10.3% In farour of Bombay stock exchange Ltd. by the Company.

5. Expenditure in Foreign Currency: - Nil -

6. Capital commitments as on 31 -03-2012: - Nil -

7. The details of the Managerial Remuneration paid are as follows:- Nil-

8. There are no employees drawing salary of Rs. 2,00,000/- or more p.m. or Rs. 24,00,000/- or more per year or part thereof.

9. Paises are rounded off to nearest Rupee. 10. Figures were re-grouped wherever necessary.

11. Confirmation of balances are not obtained for sundry debtors, creditors and advances made.

---

Mar 31, 2011

1. In the matter of compliance with the Accounting Standard" AS-22, Accounting for Taxes on Income" issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), it is to state that since the Company has unabsorbed losses to the tune of Rs. 457.121acs and further it is incurring continuous losses, there is very much uncertain in availability of future taxable income against which the deferred tax assets can be realised. As such the provision for deferred tax assets is not made.

2. The Calls-in-arrear account amounting to Rs. 1,49,500/- in respect of allotment money receivable is subject to reconciliation. Interest received on Payment of Calls-in-arrears is accounted for on actual receipt basis.

3. Depreciation was provided on W.D.V basis at the rates prescribed as per the schedule XIV of the companies Act, 1956.

4. Contingent Liability:

S. No. Case No. Stage

01. 12013/19/2004 ADJ/AC Dt. Appeal filed before Honourable 09.07.2004 Penalty imposed High Court of Andhra Rs.2.00 lacs by the Dev. Pradesh, Hyderabad. Commissioner, VSEZ, VSP.

02. C/Appeal No. 212/2000 Dues paid as per stay order granted Dt.05.07.2000 Appeal & Appeal filed pending High Court rejected on the demand of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad of Rs.17.44 lacs of for recovery CESTAT, Bangalore.

03. Appeal No. E/Mise 27/07, Appeal field before CESTAT, Dated : 9-5-2007 field Bangolore & Stay granted before CESTAT, Banglore on the orders issued by commissioner of appeals, Guntur on the tax imposed of Rs. 190 lacs notices of Asll. Commissioner - C.E, Nellore.

04. Appeal No. 21/2003, Case is in pending before High Dated : 18-12-2003 in the Court of Kerala, Ernakulam. matter of Buy-back of MPEDA Capital Investment of Rs. 16 lacs as per financial agreement dt : 31-3-1993

5. Expenditure in Foreign Currency: - Nil -

6. Capital committments as on 31-03-2011: -Nil-

7. The details of the Managerial Remuneration paid are as follows:-Nil-

8. There are no employees drawing salary of Rs.2,00,000/- or more p.m. or Rs.24,00,000/- or more per year or part thereof.

9. Paises are rounded off to nearest Rupee.

10. Figures were re-grouped wherever necessary.

11. Confirmation of balances are not obtained for sundry debtors, creditors and advances made.

---

Mar 31, 2010

1. In the matter of compliance with the Accounting Standard" AS-22, Accounting for Taxes on Income" issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), it is to state that since the Company has unabsorbed losses to the tune of Rs. 512.85 lacs and further it is incurring continuous losses, there is very much uncertain in availability of future taxable income against which the deferred tax assets can be realised. As such the provision for deferred tax assets is not made.

2. The Calls-in-arrear account amounting to Rs. 1,49,500/- in respect of allotment money receivable is subject to reconciliation. Interest received on Payment of Calls-in-arrears is accounted for on actual receipt basis.

3. Depreciation was provided on W.D. V basis at the rates prescribed as per the schedule XIV of the companies Act, 1956.

4. Contingent Liability:

S.No Case No. Stage 01. 12013/19/2004 ADJ/AC Dt.09.07.2004 Appeal filed before Honourable High Court of Andhra Penalty imposed Rs.2.00 lacs by the Pradesh HyderabatL

Dev. Commissioner, VSEZ, VSP.

02. C/Appeal No. 212/2000 Dt.05.07.2000 Dues paid as per stay order granted & Appeal filed

Appeal rejected on the demand of pending.High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad

Rs.17.44 lacs of CESTAT, Bangalore. for recovery

03. Appeal No. E/Mise 27/07, Da 9-5-2007

field before CESTAT, Banglore on the orders APPeal field before CESTAT, Bangolore & Stay

issued by commissioner of appeals, Guntur on Granted

the tax imposed of Rs. 190 lacs notices of Asll. Commissioner - C.E, Nellore.

04. Appeal No. 21/2003, Dated : 18-12-2003 Case is in pending before High Court of in the matter of Buy-back of MPEDA Kerala, Ernakulam.

Capital Investment of Rs. 16 lacs as per financial agreement dt : 31-3-1993

05. Expenditure in Foreign Currency:-Nil-

06. Capital committments as on 31-03-2010:-Nil -

07. The details of the Managerial Remuneration paid are as follows: - Nil

08. There are no employees drawing salary of Rs.2,00,000/- or more p.m. or Rs.24,00,000/- or more per year or part there of.

09. Paises are rounded off to nearest Rupee.

10. Figures were re-grouped wherever necessary.

11. Confirmation of balances are not obtained for sundry debtors, creditors and advances made.