Mar 31, 2013
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of PREMIER
INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LIMITED which comprises of the Balance Sheet as
at March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and the
Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position and
financial performance in accordance with the Accounting Standards
referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act,
1956 ("the Act"). This responsibility includes the design,
implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the
preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give a
true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due
to fraud or error. Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures
selected depend on the auditor''s judgment, including the assessment of
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the Company''s preparation and
fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and
the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us except for the effects of the matter described
in the other matter paragraph. The financial statements give the
information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a
true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31,2013 and
(b) In the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Loss for
the year ended on that date.
(c) In the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Other Matters:- Attention is invited to.:-
(a) Note no. 8(C) in respect of transfer of funds to Investor Education
& Protection Fund.
(b) Note No. 10 (Fixed Assets Schedule) regarding non-provision of
depreciation on certain machine and regarding non-provision in accounts
for extra shift depreciation on the amount of revaluation of fixed
assets.
(c) Note no. 32 (a), (b) & (c) in respect of Accounting for Employee
benefits as per revised AS-15 to some extent only.
(d) Note no. 37 regarding contingent liabilities in respect of non
provision of demand of Central Excise & Sales Tax of Rs. 3,73,16,825/-
(e) Note no. 40 regarding accounts of the company prepared on going
concern basis.
(f) The company has not adjusted interest @ 12 % on loans taken from
related parties as agreed on Rs. 20,88,45,557/-. The amount of interest
on such loans is of Rs. 2,49,75,518/-. Refer Note. No.4(d)(ii) (iii)
and 6 (b).
The impact of item (a), (c) ,(d) & (e) is not there but considering the
impact of item (b) & (f) above if the interest & non Provision of
Depreciation would have been charged the loss for the year would have
been Rs. 7,56,86,821/- before tax and Rs 6,23,79,364/- after tax and
accordingly the Reserves and Surplus would have been Rs. 43,06,88,951/
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that: a.We have
obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our
knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit;
b. In our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examina tion of those
books and proper returns adequate for the purposes of our audit have
been received from branches not visited by us;
c. The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and
the Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting standards referred
to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
e. On the basis of written representations received from the directors
as on March 31, 2013, and taken on record by the Board of Directors,
none of the directors is disqualified as on March 31, 2013, from being
appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section (1) of
section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITOR''S REPORT
Annexure Referred to in paragraph 1 of our Audit report of even date on
the accounts for the year ended 31st March 2013 of PREMIER INDUSTRIES
(INDIA) LIMITED
As required by the companies (Auditors report) order 2003 issued by the
Company law Board in the terms of section 227(4A) of the Companies Act
1956, we have further to report that: -
1. (a) In respect of fixed assets; the Company has maintained proper
records showing full particulars including quantitative details and
situation of fixed assets.
(b) These Fixed Assets have been physically verified by the management,
in accordance with the programme of verification adopted by the
company. In our opinion.the frequency of verification is reasonable
having regard to the size of the company and the nature of its assets.
(c) There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
2. (a) The inventory of the Company has been physically verified by
the management during the year and at the year end. In our opinion the
frequency of verification is reasonable.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management were found reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of records of inventory, in our
opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and
discrepancies noticed on physical verification between the physical
stocks and the book records were not material in relation to the
operations of the Company.
3. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to
Companies.firms or other parties covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.Accordingly the provision
of Clause 4(iii)(a) to (d) of the Companies (Auditor''s Report
)Order,2003(as amended) are not applicable to company and hence not
commented upon. (b) According to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has taken unsecured loan from Two parties
covered in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956. However interest for the year as per agreed rate 12% has not
been adjusted during the year and were considered as Without Interest.
The outstanding balance as on 31.03.2013 was Rs.20,88,45,557/- and the
maximum balance outstanding was Rs.21,17,77,613/-.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, there are adequate internal control procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business with regard to purchases of inventory, fixed assets and with
regard to the sale of goods and services. During the course of our
audit, we have not observed any continuing failure to correct major
weaknesses in internal controls.
5. (a) In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, the particulars of contracts or arrangements
or transactions referred to in section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
have been entered in the register required to be maintained under
Section 301 of the companies Act, 1956. (b) In our opinion and
according to the information and explanations given to us, transactions
made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the Register
maintained under Section 301 of the companies Act, 1956 have been made
at prices which are prima facie reasonable, having regard to prevailing
market prices at the relevant time where such market prices are
available.
6. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not accepted any deposit from public in
contravention with the provisions of Section 58-A and 58AA or any other
relevant provisions of the Act and the Companies (Acceptance of
Deposits) Rules, 1975. No order has been passed by the Company Law
Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any
Court or any other Tribunal on the Company in respect of any deposits.
7. The Company has an Internal Audit System, which in our A opinion is
adequate and commensurate with the size of th%^'' Company and nature of
its business. ''
8. We have been informed that the prescribed cost records pursuant to
the rule made by the Central Government under section 209 (1) (d) of
the Companies Act, 1956 are being maintained for its Soya Division.
However we have not '' carried out any detailed examination of such
accounts and records with a view to determine whether they are accurate
or complete.
9. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is generally regular in depositing provident fund and employees
state insurance with appropriate authorities during the year.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amount payable in respect of income-tax, sales tax,
wealth-tax, service-tax customs duty, excise duty, cess as on 31.3.2013
were outstanding for a period of more than six months from the date
they became payable except for Sales Tax , Entry Tax & TDS aggregating
to Rs. 14144671/- (Previous Year Rs. 13374150/-) for earlier years were
due for payment for more than six months.
(c) As on 31st March 2013, According to the records of the company and
the information and explanations given to us, the following are the
particulars of dues on account of Income tax, Excise Duty, Cess, Sales
Tax Service Tax Custom duty and wealth Tax matters that have not been
deposited on account of disputes:-
10. (a) The Company has nt made cash profit during the financial year
covered by our audit and also in the immediately preceding financial
year and it has accumulated losses as on 31.03.2013 exceeding its net
worth. (b) According to the information provided by the company, the
company is a Sick Industrial Company within the meaning of section 3
(I) (xii) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act,1985
and is duly registered with BIFR.
11. The Company has defaulted in the repayment of dues to Financial
Institutions. Bank and debenture holders and the period, amount of
default and the explanations furnished by the Company affe as follows:
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities. Therefore,
the other provisions of clause 4 (xii) of the Companies (Auditor''s
Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the Company.
13. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit
fund / society. Therefore, the provisions of clause 4(xiii) of the
Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
Company.
14. In our opinion, according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company is not dealing in or trading in shares,
securities, debentures and other investments.
15. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantees for loans taken by others from
banks or financial institutions during the year.
16. According to the information and explanation given to us, the
company has not taken any term loans during the year.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us and an
overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the company, we report that
funds raised on short-term basis, have been used for short term purpose
only.
18. The Company has not made preferential allotment of share to parties
and Companies covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 during the year covered by our audit.
19. The company has not issued any debentures during the year under
review.
20. The company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year under review.
21. To the best of our knowledge and belief and according to the
information and explanation given to us, no fraud on or by the Company
has been noticed or reported during the course of our audit.
For :M/SM.MEHTA&CO.
Chartered Accountants
(Firm Reg. No. 000957C)
DATE : 31.08.2013 CA : P.R.Bandi
PLACE : INDORE Partner
(M.No. 16402)
Mar 31, 2012
1) We have audited the attached Balance sheet of PREMIER INDUSTRIES
(INDIA) LIMITED,DEWAS as at 31st March,2012 and the relative Profit
& Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that
date, which we have signed under reference to this report. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the
Company. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
2) We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material mis-state- ment. An audit
includes, examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principals used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3) We have obtained all the information and explana- tions which, to
the best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of
our audit.
4) In our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law, have
been kept by the Company, so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
5) The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account.
6) In our opinion the Balance Sheet and the Profit & Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt by this report are in compliance with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3c) of the Companies
Act, 1956.
7) On the basis of written representation received from ail the
Directors of the Company as on 31st March, 2012 and the information and
explanation as made available, we report that none of the Directors of
the Company prima facie have any disqualification as referred to in
Clause (g) of Sub-Section (1) of the Section 274 of the Companies Act,
1956.
8) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with and
subject to :-
i. Note No. 8(c) in respect of non-transfer of funds to Investors
Education and Protection Funds.
ii. Note No. 10 (Fixed Assets Schedule) regarding non-provision of
depreciation on certain machine and regarding non-provision in accounts
for extra shift depreciation on the amount of revaluation of fixed
assets.
iii. Note No. 33 in respect of adopting of revised AS-15 to some extent
only.
iv. Note No. 38 regarding contingant liabilities in respect of
non-provision of demand of Central Excise & Sales Tax.
v. Note No. 41 regarding accounts of the Company prepared on going
concern basis.
We further report that without considering item mentioned at (i),
(iii), (iv), (v) above the effect of which is not there, had the
observations made by us in paragraphs (ii) above been considered, the
Loss for the year would have been Rs. 2,53,87,679 (as against the
reported Loss of Rs. 2,33,39,799), debit balance of Profit & Loss
Accounts would have been Rs. 44,02,18,824 (as against the reported
figures of Rs. 43,81,70,944), and read together with other notes there
on give the information required by the Com- pany Act, 1956 in the
manner so required and give a true and fair view, in confirmaty with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India.
(a) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March,2012.
(b) In the case of Profit & Loss Account of the Loss of the Company for
the year ended on that date. and
(c) In the case of Cash Flow statement of the Cash Flows for the year
ended on that date.
As required by the Companies (Auditors'Report) order, 2003 issued by
Central Government Of India in terms of Sub-Section (4A) of Section 227
of the Companies Act, 1956, we further report that:
i. a) The nature of the Companie's business/activities during the
year was such that clause (xii),(xiii) and (xiv) of the paragraph 4 of
the Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003 are not applicable to the
Com- pany
ii. a) The Company has maintained proper records show- ing full
particulars, including quantitative details and unit wise situation of
fixed assets.
b) Physical verification of fixed assets was carried out during the
year in accordance with the Company's policy. In our opinion the
frequency of verification is at reasonable intervals having regard to
the size of the company and nature of assets. According to the infor-
mation and explaination given to us no materials dis- crepancies were
noticed on such verification.
c) During the year, in our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets
has not been disposed off by the Com- pany.
iii. a) The inventory of the Company has been physically verified by
the management during the year and at the year end. In our opinion the
frequency of verifica- tion is resonable.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedure of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management were found reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and nature of its business,
c) On the basis of our examination of records of inventory, in our
opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and
discrepancies noticed on physical verification between the physical
stock and the book records were not material in relation to the
operation of the Company.
iv. a) In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, the Company has taken loans during the year
from two parties listed in the Register maintained under section 301 of
the Compa- nies Act, 1956, .The outstanding balance as on 31.03.12 was
Rs.22,06,31,004/- and the maximum balance outstanding was Rs.
22,57,03,354/-.
b) The terms & condition of such loan was not preju- dicial to the
interest of the Company.
c)In our opinion and according to the explanation given to us the
company is regular in paying the principal and interest wherever
applicable.
(d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not granted any loans to parties listed in
the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956,
except has maintained a Current A/c with one of its Group Company,
hence sub clause (iii) (b), (c) and (d) of the Order are not applicable
in respect of loans granted.
v. According to the information and explanations given to us, there is
an adequate internal control procedure commensurate with the size of
the Company and na- ture of its business, for purchase of raw
materials, stores, components, plant & machinery, equipment and other
assets.
vi. a) Based on the Audit procedure applied by us and as per the
information and explainations given to us the particulars of Contracts
or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Act are entered in
the register require to be maintained under that section.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has pur- chased/sold stores, raw materials,
finished goods and components from / to and also paid rent, processing
charges, interest to Company in which Directors are interested as
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 1956, at prices which are reasonable having regards to prevailing
market prices of such goods, materials or services or the prices at
which transaction for similar goods, ma- terials or services have been
made with other parties.
vii. The Company has not accepted any deposit from public as defined in
section 58-A of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed thereunder
except Inter Corpo- rate deposit from body corporates. No order has
been passed by Company Law Board ,National Company Law Tribunal or any
Court during the year.
viii. In our opinion, the internal audit system is reasonably
commensurate with the size and nature of the busi- ness of the Company.
ix. We have been informed that the prescribed cost records pursuant to
the rule made by the Central Government under section 209 (1) (d) of
the Companies Act, 1956 are being maintained for its Soya Division.
However we have not carried out any detailed examination of such
accounts and records with a view to determine whether they are accurate
or complete.
x. a) The Company has been regular in depositing during the year
provident fund and employees state insurance dues with the appropriate
authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amount payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Custom
Duty,Excise Duty and Service Tax as on 31.03.12 were outstanding for a
period of more than six months (except deferement of Sales Tax and
Entry Tax for the year) from the date they became payable except the
Entry Tax of Rs 1727109 /-due for earlier years and Vat Tax of Rs.
11647041/ - due up to 30.09.2011.
c) As on 31.03.12, according to records of the Company and the
information and explanations given to us, the following are the
particulars of dues on account of Income Tax, Excise Duty,Cess, Sales
Tax, Service Tax,Custom Duty and Wealth tax matters that have not been
deposited on account of any dispute:
Sr.
No. Name of
the Statute Nature of
the dues Amount
(Rs.In lacs) Forum where
pending
1 Commercial
Tax Levies Sales Tax &
Entry Tax 24694662/- Commissioner of
Demand
including Sales Tax
interest &
penalty
2 Central
Excise Act,
1944 Excise Duty 1118153/- Commissioner of
Central Excise
(Appeal)
xi. a) In our opinion the company's accumulated losses as on 31.03.12
exceeds its net worth and it has incurred cash loss during the
financial year ended on that date and had also incurred cash loss in
the immediate preceding financial.
b) According to the information provided by the Company, the Company is
a Sick Industrial Company within the meaning of section 3(1)(XII) of
the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985 and is duly
registered with BIFR.
xii. The Company has defaulted in the repayment of dues to Financial
Institutions. Bank and debenture holders and the period, amount of
default and the explanations furnished by the Company are as follows:
S.
No. Name of
Financial Total Default till
31.03.12 including Period of Default
Institutions
/Bank/Others principal amount &
Interest (as per
revival package duly
approved by AAIFR)
(In Rs.)
1 DEBENTURE
HOLDERS 9901954 F. Y. 1999-2000
To 2011-12
xiii. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given guarantee to Banks, the terms and conditions whereof,
are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
xiv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not taken any term loan during the year.
xv. Based on the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, in our
opinion, the funds raised on shortterm basis have prima facie been used
for shortterm purpose only.
xvi. During the year the Company has not made preferential allotment of
shares to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xvii. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
xviii. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the year, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported.
FOR M/S M. MEHTA & CO.
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Firm Reg. No. 000957C
CA: (P. R.BANDI)
PLACE: INDORE PARTNER
DATE:31.05.2012 (M.N0.16402)
Mar 31, 2010
1. We have audited the attached Balance sheet of PREMIER INDUSTRIES
(INDIA)LIMITED,DEWAS as at 31st March,2010 and the relative
Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on
that date, which we have signed under reference to this report.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the management of
the Company. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
2) We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material mis-statement. An audit
includes, examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principals used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief.were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
4) In our opinion, proper books of account, as required bylaw, have
been kept by the company, so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
5) The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account.
6) In our opinion the Balance Sheet and the Profit & Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt by this report are in compliance with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3c) of the Companies
Act, 1956.
7) On the basis of written representation received from all the
Directors of the Company and the information and explanation as made
available, Directors of the Company do not prima facie have any
disqualification as referred to in Clause (g) of Sub-Section (1) of the
Section 274 of the Act, 1956.
8) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with and
subject to :-
i. Note No. 1 regarding contingant liabilities in respect of
non-provision of demand of Central Excise & Sales Tax.
ii. Note No.7 (a) regarding non-provision of depreciation on certain
machine and No. 7
(b) regarding non-provision in accounts for extra shift depreciation on
the amount of revaluation of fixed assets.
iii. Note No.11 for non-provision of part of sundry debtors and loans
and advances considered doubtful.
iv. Note No.16 (a) regarding accounts of the Company prepared on going
concern basis.
v. Note No. 18 in respect of non-transfer of funds to investors
education and protection funds.
vi. Note No. 19 in respect of adopting of revised AS-15 to some extent
only.
We further report that without considering item mentioned at (i), (iv),
(v), (vi), above the effect of which is not there, had the observations
made by us in paragraphs (ii), and (iii) above been considered, the
Loss for the year would have been Rs.140.31 lacs (as against the
reported Loss of Rs. 77.65 lacs), debit balance of Profit & Loss
Accounts would have been Rs. 3595.09 lacs (as against the reported
figures of Rs. 3532.43 lacs), and read together with other notes there
on give the information required by the Company Act, 1956 in the manner
so required and give a true and fair view, in confirmaty with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India.
(a) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March,2010.
(b) In the case of Profit & Loss Account of the Loss of the Company for
the year ended on that date.
and
(c) In the case of Cash Flow statement of the Cash Flows for the year
ended on that date.
As required by the Companies (AuditorsReport) order, 2003 issued by
Central Government Of India in terms of Sub-Section (4A) of Section 227
of the Companies Act, 1956, we further report that :
i The nature of the Companies business/activities during the year was
such that clause (xii).(xiii) and (xiv) of the paragraph 4 of the
Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003 are not applicable to the
Company ii. a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and unit wise situation of
fixed assets.
b) Physical verification of fixed assets was carried out during the
year in accordance with the Companys policy. In our opinion the
frequency of verification is at reasonable intervals having regard to
the size of the company and nature of assets. According to the
information and explaination given to us no materials discrepancies
were noticed on such verification.
c) During the year, in our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets
has not been disposed off by the Company.
iii. a) The inventory of the Company has been physically verified by
the management during the year and at the year end. In our opinion the
frequency of verification is resonable.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedure of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management were found reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and nature of its business.
c) On the basis of our exmanination of records of inventory, in our
opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and
discrepancies noticed on physical verification between the physical
stock and the book records were not material in relation to the
operation of the Company.
iv. a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has taken loans during the year from three
parties listed in the Register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956, .The outstanding balance as on 31.03.10 was Rs.
16,51,45,597/- and the maximum balance outstanding was
Rs.17,29,04,357/-.
b) The terms & condition of such loan was not prejudicial to the
interest of the Company.
c) In our opinion and according to the explanation given to us the
company is regular in paying the principal and interest is stipulated.
(d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not granted any loans to parties listed in
the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956,
except has maintained a Current A/c with one of its Group Company,
hence sub clause (iii) (b), (c) and (d) of the Order are not applicable
in respect of loans granted.
v. According to the information and explanations given to us, there is
an adequate internal control procedure commensurate with the size of
the Company and nature of its business, for purchase of raw materials,
stores, components, plant & machinery, equipment and other assets
vi. a) Based on the Audit procedure applied by us and as per the
information and explainations given to us the particulars of Contacts,
or arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Act are entered in
the register require to be maintained under that section. b)ln our
opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us,
the Company has purchased/sold stores, raw materials, finished goods
and components from / to and also paid rent, processing charges ,
interest to Company in which Directors are interested as listed in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, at
prices which are reasonable having regards to prevailing market prices
of such goods, materials or services or the prices at which transaction
for similar goods, materials or services have been made with other
parties.
vii. The Company has not accepted any deposit from public as defined in
section 58-A of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed thereunder
except Inter Corporate deposit from body corporates. No order has been
passed by Company Law Board .National Company Law Tribunal or any Court
during the year.
viii. In our opinion, the internal audit system is reasonably
commensurate with the size and nature of the business of the Company.
ix. We have been informed that the prescribed cost records pursuant to
the rule made by the Central Government under section 209 (1) (d) of
the Companies Act, 1956 are being maintained for its Soya Division.
However we have not carried out any detailed examination of such
accounts and records with a view to determine whether they are accurate
or complete.
x. a) The Company has been regular in depositing during the year
provident fund and employees state insurance dues with the appropriate
authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amount payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Custom
Duty .Excise Duty and Service Tax as on 31.03.10 were outstanding for a
period of more than six months (except deferement of Sales Tax and
Entry Tax for the year) from the date they became payable except the
Entry Tax of Rs 4,14,557 /- due for earlier years. And Vat Tax of Rs.
56,50,975 /- due up to 30.09.2010.
c) As on 31.03.10, according to records of the Company and the
information and explanations given to us, the following are the
particulars of dues on account of Income Tax, Excise Duty.Cess, Sales
Tax, Service Tax .Custom Duty and Wealth tax matters that have not been
deposited on account of any dispute:
S. Name of Nature of Amount Forum where
No the Statute the dues (Rs.ln lacs) pending
1 Commercial Tax Sales Tax &
Entry Tax
Demand 88.20 Commissioner of Sales
Tax
Levies including
interest &
penalty
2 Central Excise
Act, 1944 Excise Duty 20.18 Commissioner of Central
Excise (Appeal)
xi. a) In our opinion the companys accumulated losses as on 31.03.10
exceeds its net worth and it has incurred cash loss during the
financial year ended on that date and earned cash profit in the
immediate preceding financial year.
b) According to the information provided by the Company, the company is
a sick industrial company within the meaning of section 3(1) (XII) of
the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985 and is duly
registered with BIFR. xii. The Company has defaulted in the repayment
of dues to financial institutions. Bank and debenture holders and the
period, amount of default
and the explanations furnished by the Company are as follows:
(Rs.in lacs)
S.
No.Name of Financial
Institutions/Bank Total Default till 31.03.10
including Period of Default
/Others principle amount & Interest
(as per revival package
duly approved by AAIFR)
CANARA BANK 306.00 FY 1999-2000 TO
2009-10
2. DEBENTURE HOLDERS 99.02 -DO-
xiii According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given guarantees to bank, the terms and conditions wereof ,
are not prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
xiv. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not taken any term loan during the year.
xv. Based on the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, in our
opinion, the funds raised on short term basis have prima facie been
used for short term purpose only.
xvi. During the year the Company has not made preferential allotment
of shares to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xvii. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
xviii.The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
xix. According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the year, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported.
For : M/S M.MEHTA & CO.
Chartered Accountants
DATE : 31.08.2010 (P.R.Bandi)
PLACE : INDORE Partner
(M.No. 16402)
(Firm Reg. No. 000957C)
Mar 31, 2009
1. We have audited the attached Balance sheet of PREMIER INDUSTRIES
(INDIA)LIMITED,DEWAS as at 31st March,2009 and the relative Profit &
Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that
date, which we have signed under reference to this report. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the
Company. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are" free of material mis-statement. An audit
includes, examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
3. We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief.were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
4. In our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law, have
been kept by the company, so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
5. The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account. .
6. In our opinion the Balance Sheet and the Profit & Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt by this report are in compliance with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3c) of the Companies
Act, 1956.
7. On the basis of written representation received from all the
Directors of the Company and the information and explanation.as made
available, Directors of the Company do not prima facie have any
disqualification as referred to in Clause (g) of Sub-Section (1) of the
Section 274 of the Act, 1956.
8. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with and
subject to :-
i. Note No. 1 regarding contingant liabilities in respect of
non-provision of demand of Central Excise & Sales Tax.
ii. Note No.6 (a) regarding non-provision of depreciation on certain
machine and No. 6 (b) regarding non-provision in accounts for extra
shift depreciation on the amount of revaluation of fixed assets.
iii. Note No.10 for non-provision of part of sundry debtors and loans
and advances considered doubtful.
iv. Note No.12 (b) in respect of leased assets.
v. Note No.13 in respect of Sales TaxA/AT liabilities. .
vi. Note No.15 (a) regarding accounts of the Company prepared on going
concern basis.
vii. Note No. 17 in respect of non-transfer of funds to investors
education and protection funds.
viii. Note No. 18 in respect of adopting of revised AS-15 to some
extent only.
ix. Note No. 19 in respect of written off of unsecured loans / lease
rentals .
x. Note No. 20 in respect of directly crediting NON COMPETE FEES as an
extra ordinary item in Profit and Loss Account.
We further report that without considering item mentioned at (i), (iv),
(v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x) above the effect of which is not
there, had the observations made by us in paragraphs (ii), and (iii)
above been considered, the Profit for the year would have been
Rs.144.53 lacs (as against the reported Profit of Rs. 242.42 lacs),
debit balance of Profit & Loss Accounts would have been Rs.3162.42 lacs
(as against the reported figures of Rs. 3064.53 lacs), and read
together with other notes there on give the information required by the
Company Act, 1956 in the manner so required and give a true and fair
view, in confirmaty with the accounting principles generally accepted
in India.
a) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company
as at 31st March,2009.
b) In the case of Profit & Loss Account of the Profit of the Company
for the year ended on that date.
and
c) In the case of Cash Flow statement of the Cash Flows for the year
ended on that date.
As required by the Companies (AuditorsReport) order, 2003 issued by
Central Government Of India in terms of Sub-Section (4A) of Section 227
of the Companies Act, 1956, we further report that :
i. a) The nature of the Companies business/activities during the year
was such that clause (xii).(xiii) and (xiv) of the paragraph 4 of the
Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003 are not applicable to the
Company
ii. a)The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and unit wise situation of
fixed assets. b) Physical verification of fixed assets was carried out
during the year in accordance with the Companys policy. In our opinion
the frequency of verification is at reasonable intervals having regard
to the size of the company and nature of assets. According to the
information and explanation given to us no materials discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
c)During the year, in our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets
has not been disposed off by the Company.
iii. a) The inventory of the Company has been physically verified by
the management during the year and at the year end. In our opinion the
frequency of verification is reasonable.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedure of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management were found reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Companyand nature of its business.
c) On the basis of our exmanination of records of inventory, in our
opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and
discrepancies noticed on physical verification between the physical
stock and the book records were not material in relation to the
operation of the Company. Ã
iv. a) In our opinion and according to the information and
explanations given to us, the Company has taken loans during the year
from three parties listed in the Register maintained under section 301
of the Companies Act, 1956, .The outstanding balance as on 31.03.09 was
Rs.10,35,99,383/- and the maximum balance outstanding was
Rs.13,90,92,105/-. b) The terms & condition of such loan was not
prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
c)ln our opinion and according to the explanation given to us the
company is regular in paying the principle and interest is stipulated.
: d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not granted any loans to parties listed in
the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956,
except has maintained a Current A/c with one of its Group Company,
hence sub clause (iii) (b), (c) and (d) of the Order are not applicable
in respect of loans granted.
iv. According to the information and explanations given to us, there is
an adequate internal control procedure commensurate with the size of
the Company and nature of its business, for purchase of raw materials,
stores, components, plant & machinery, equipment and other assets. ,
v. a) Based on the Audit procedure applied by us and as per the
information and explainations given to us the particulars of Contract
or ; arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Act are entered in
the register require to be maintained under that section. b)|n our
opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us,
the Company has purchased/sold stores, raw materials, finished goods
and components from / to and also paid rent, processing charges ,
interest to Company in which Directors are interested as listed in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, at
prices which are reasonable having regards to prevailing market
prices of such goods, materials or services or the prices at which
transaction for similar goods, materials or services have been made
with other parties.
vi. The Company has not accepted any deposit from public as defined in
section 58-A of the Companies Act, 1956 and the rules framed thereunder
except Inter Corporate deposit from body corporates. No order has been
passed by Company Law Board .National Company Law , Tribunal or any
Court during the year. ;
vii. In our opinion, the internal audit system is reasonably
commensurate with the size and nature of the business of the Company.
viii. We have been informed that the prescribed cost records pursuant
to the rule made by the Central Government under section 209 (1) (d) of
the Companies Act, 1956 are being maintained for its Soya Division.
However we have not carried out any detailed examination of such
accounts and records with a view to determine whether they are accurate
or complete.
ix. a) The Company has been regular in depositing during the year
provident fund and employees state insurance dues with the appropriate
authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amount payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Custom
Duty .Excise Duty and Service Tax as on 31.03.09 were outstanding for a
period of more than six months (except deferement of Sales Tax and
Entry Tax for the year) from the date they became payable except the
Entry Tax of Rs 359S8 /- due for earlier years. And VAT Tax Of Rs.
4201992 /- due up to 30.09.2008.
c) As on 31.03.09, according to records of the Company and the
information and explanations given to us, the following are the
particulars of dues on account of Income Tax, Excise Duty.Cess, Sales
Tax, Service Tax .Custom Duty and Wealth tax matters that have not been
deposited on account deposited on account of any dispute:
S. Name of Nature of Amount Forum where
No. the Statute the dues (Rs.In lacs) pending
1 Commercial Tax Sales Tax & Entry
Tax Demand 318.31 Commissioner of
Sates Tax
Levies including interest
& penalty
2 Central Excise
Act, 1944 Excise Duty 20.18 Commissioner of
Central Excise (Appeal)
X. a) In our opinion the companys accumulated losses as on 31.03.09
exceeds its net worth and it has incurred cash loss during the
financial year ended on that date and earned cash profit in the
immediate preceding financial year without considering extra ordinary
items.
b) According to the information provided by the Company, the company is
a sick industrial company within the meaning of section 3(1)(XII) of
the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985 and is duly
registered with BIFR.
xi. The Company has defaulted in the repayment of dues to financial
institutions. Bank and debenture holders and the period, amount of
default and the explanations furnished by the Company are as follows:
(Rs.in lacs)
S.
No. Name of Financial
Institutions/Bank Total Default till
31.03.09 including Period of Default
/Others principle amount &
Interest (as per revival
package duly approved
by AAIFR)
1. CANARABANK 470.00 F.Y. 1999-2000 TO 2008-09
2. DEBENTURE HOLDERS 99.03 --DO--
xii According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given guarantees for loans taken by others from Bank &
Financial Institutions, the terms and conditions wereof , are not
prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
xiii. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not taken any term loan during the year.
xiv. Based on the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, in our
opinion, the funds raised on short term basis have prima facie been
used for short term purpose only.
xv. During the year the Company has not made preferential allotment of
shares to parties and Companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xvi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures during the year
xvii The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us,
during the year, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or
reported.
For : M/S M.MEHTA & CO.
Chartered Accountants
DATE : 30.07.2009 (P.R.Bandi)
PLACE : INDORE Partner
(M.No. 16402)
Mar 31, 2008
1. We have audited the attached Balance sheet of PREMIER INDUSTRIES
(INDIA) LMITED. DEWAS at at 31st March.2008 and the relative Profit &
Loss Account and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that
date, which we have signed under reference to this report. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the management of the
Company. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain resonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material mis-statement. An audit
includes, examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principals used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a resonable
basis for our opinion.
3. We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief. were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
4. In our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law, have
been kept by the company, so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
5. The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account and the Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account.
6. In our opinion the Balance Sheet and the Profit & Loss Account and
the Cash Flow Statement dealt by this report are in compliance with the
Accounting Standards referred to in Section 211 (3c) of the Companies
Act, 19S6.
7. On the basis of written representation received from all the
Directors of the Company and the information and explanation as made
available Directors of the Company do not prima facie have any
disqualification as referred to in Clause (g) of Sub-Section (1) of the
Section 274 of the Act, 1956.
8. In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with and
subject to :-
i. Note No. 1 regarding contingant liabilities in respect of
non-provision of demand of Central Excise & Sales Tax.
ii. Note No.6
(a) regarding non-provision of depreciation on certain machine and
No. 6
(b) regarding non-provision in accounts for extra shill depreciation on
the amount of revaluation of raced assets.
iii. Note No.10 for non-provision of part of sundry debtors and loans
and advances considered doubtful. iv. Note No.12 (b) in respect of
leased assets. v. Note No.13 in respect of Sales Tax/VAT liabilities.
vi. Note No.15
(a) regarding accounts of the Company prepared on going concern basis.
vii. Note No. 17 in respect of non-provision of interest of Rs. 11.16
lacs on unsecured loans taken from some parties.
viii. Note No. 18 in respect of non-transfer of funds to investors
education and protection funds.
ix. Note No. 19 in respect of write back of interest payable to Canara
Bank
x. Note No. 20 in respect of adopting of revised AS-15 to some extent
only.
We further report that without considering item mentioned at (i), (iv),
(v), (vi) and (viii) above the effect of which is not there, had the
observations made by us in paragraphs (ii), (iii)and(vii) above been
considered, the Profit for the year would have been Rs.108.21 lacs (as
against the reported loss of Rs. 179.80 lacs), debit balance of Profit
& Loss Accounts would have been Rs.3199.43 lacs (as against the
reported figures of Rs. 3307.64 lacs), and read together with other
notes there on give the information required by the Company Act, 1956
in the manner so required and give a true and fair view, in confirmaty
with the accounting principles generally accepted in India.
a) In the case of Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the Company
us at 31st March,2008.
b) In the case of Profit & Loss Account of the Profit of the Company or
the year ended on that date. and
c) In the case of Cash Flow statement of the Cash Flows for the year
ended on that date.
As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) order. 2003 issued by
Central Government Of India in terms of Sub-Section (4A) of Section 227
of the Companies Act. 1956, we further report that :
i. a) The nature of the Companies business/activities during the year
was such that clause (xii).(xiii) and (xiv) of the paragraph 4 of the
Companies (Auditors Report) Order 2003 are not applicable to the
Company
ii a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars, including quantitative details and unit wise situation of
fixed assets.
b) Physical verification of fixed assets was carried out during the
year in accordance with the Companys policy. In our opinion the
(requency of verification is at resonable intervals having regard to
the size of the company and nature of assets. According to the
information and explaination given to us no materials discrepancies
were noticed on such verfication.
c) During the year, in our opinion, a substantial part of fixed assets
has not been disposed off by the Company.
iii. a) The inventory of the Company has been physically verified by
the management during the year and at the year end. In our opinion the
frequency of verification is resonable.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedure of physical verification of inventory
followed by the management were found resonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the Company and nature of its business.
c) On the basis of our exmanination of records of inventory, in. our
opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory and
discrepancies noticed on physical verification between the physical
stock and the book records were not material in relation to the
operation of the Company.
iv. a) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has taken loans during the year from three
parties listed in the Register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, .1956, .The outstanding balance as on 31.03.08 was
Rs.7,13,30.833/- and the maximum balance outstanding was
Rs.11.97.56,159/-.-
b)The terms A condition of such loan was not prejudicial to the
Interest of the Company.
c) In our opinion and according to the explanation given to us the
company Is regular in paying the principal and interest is stipulated.
d) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not granted any loans to parlies listed in
the Register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956,
except has maintained a Currant Ate with one of its Group Company.
hence sub clause (ill) (b), (c) and (d) of the Order are not applicable
in respect of loans granted.
iv. According to the Information and explanations given to us. there
is an adequate Internal control procedure commensurate with the size of
the Company and nature of its business, for purchase of raw materials,
stores, components, plant & machinery, equipment and other assets.
v. a) Based on the Audit procedure applied by us and as per the
information and explanations given to us the particulars of Contacts or
arrangements referred to in Section 301 of the Act are entered in the
register require to be maintained under that section.
b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has purchased/sold stores, raw materials.
finished goods and components from / to and also paid rent, processing
charges , interest to Company in which Directors are interested as
listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies
Act, 19S6, at prices which are reasonable having regards to prevailing
market prices of such goods. materials or services or the prices at
which transaction for similar goods, materials or services have been
made with other parties.
vi. The Company has not accepted any deposit from public as defined in
section 58-A of the Companies Act. 19S6 and the rules framed thereunder
except Inter Corporate deposit from body corporales. No order has been
passed by Company Law Board .National Company Law Tribunal or any Court
during the year.
vii. In our opinion, the internal audit system is reasonably
commensurate with the size and nature of the business of the Company.
viii. We have been informed that the prescribed cost records puersuant
to the rule made by the Central Government under section 209 (1)
ix. a) The Company has been regular in depositing during the year
provident fund and employees state insurance dues with the appropriate
authorities.
b) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed amount payable In respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Custom
Duty .Excise Duty and Service Tax as on 31.03.08 were outstanding for a
period of more than sac months (except deferement of Sales Tax and
Entry Tax for the year) from the date they became payable except the
Entry Tax of Rs 2,87.181/- due for earlier years. And Vat Tax of Rs.
18,72,014/- due up to 30.09.2007.
c) As on 31.03.08, according to records of the Company and the
Information and explanations given to us, the following are the
particulars of dues on account of Income Tax, Excise Duty. Cess, Sales
Tax, Service Tax .Custom Duty and Wealth tax matters that have not been
deposited on account of any dispute:
S Name of Nature of Amount Form where
No. the Statute the dues (Rs. ln
lacs) Pending
1 Commercial Tax Sales Tax & Entry
Tax Demand 318.31 Commissioner
of Sales Tax
Levies including interest
& penalty
2 Central Excise
Act. 1944 Excise Duty 44.98 Commissioner
of Central Excise
(Appeel)
x. a) In our opinion the companys accumulated losses as on 31.03.08
exceeds its net worth and it has earned cash profit during the
financial year ended on that dale and Incurred cash loss in the
immediate preceding financial year.
b) According to the information provided by the Company, the company is
a sick Industrial company within the meaning of section 3(1)(XD) of the
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985 and is duly
registered with BIFR.
xi. The Company has defaulted in the repayment of dues to financial
institutions. Bank and debenture holder* and the period, amount of
default and the explanations furnished by the Company are as follows::
(Rs in lacs)
S
No Name of Financial
Institutions/Bank Total Default til
31.03.08 including Period of default
/Others principal amount &
lnterest (as per
revival package duly
approved by AAIFR)
1 CANARA BANK 650.00 F.Y 1999-2000 TO
2007-06
2 DEBENTURE HOLDERS 99.17 --DO--
xii According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has given guarantees for loans taken by others from Bank &
Financial Institutions, the terms and conditions were of, are not
prejudicial to the interest of the Company.
xiii. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not taken any term loan during the year.
xiv. Based on the information and explanations given to us and on an
overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, in our
opinion, the funds raised on short term basis have prima facie been
used for short term purpose only.
xv. During the year the Company has not made preferential allotment of
shares to parlies and Companies covered in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
xvi. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not issued any debentures during the year
xvii. The Company has not raised any money by public issue during the
year.
xviii. According to the information and explanations given to us,
during the year, no fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or
reported.
For : M/S M. MEHTA & CO.
Chartered Accountants
DATE : 31.07.2008 (P. R. Bandi)
PLACE : INDORE Partner.
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article