Mar 31, 2010
We have audited the attached balance Sheet of Mis. Krisons Electronic
Systems Limited as at 31.03.2010 and the Profit & Loss Account for the
year ended on that date, annexed thereto and Cash Flow Statement for
the period ended on that date. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
1. We conducted our audit in accordance with Auditing Standards
generally accepted, in India. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis evidence supporting the amounts and
discloses in financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and estimates made by the management as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
2 As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003
(CARO)issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section
(4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act,1956. and on the basis of such
checks as we considered appropriate and according to the information
and explanations given to us, we enclose in the Annexure a statement on
the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order.
3. Further to our comments paragraph 2 above, we state that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the company, so far as, appears from our examination of the
audit.
c) The Balance Sheet and the Profit and Loss Account referred to in
this report are in agreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet and the Profit & Loss Account
complies with the mandatory accounting standards except Accounting
Standard 15 on accounting for retirement benefits as referred to in
Section 211 (3C) of the Companies Act, 1956.
e) In our opinion, and based on information and explanations given to
us, none of the directors are disqualified as at 31st March, 2010 from
being appointed as Directors in terms of Section 274(1) (g) of the
Companies Act, 1956.
f) We draw attention to Note No. 1 in schedule 11 regarding the net
worth of the company.
g) No provision for doubtful debts and bans & advances amounting to
Rs.99,25,565.53 have been made (Refer Note No.
h) We draw attention to Para 1 of annexure to our report of even date
regarding going concern status of the Company.
i) In view of the significance of our observations in Para (f), (g) &
{h) above, we are of the opinion that the said accounts DO NOT GIVE a
true and fair view:-
(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31st March, 2010.
(b) In the case of Profit & Loss Account of the loss for the year ended
on 31st March, 2010.
(c) In so far as it relates to the Cash Flow Statement of the cash flow
of the Company for the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS' REPORT
1 The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars,
including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets. As
explained to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified by the
management at all locations at reasonable intervals. According to the
information and explanation given to us no material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification. The fixed assets disposed off during the
year construe a substantial part of the fixed assets of the Company
and such disposal may affect the going concern status of the Company.
2 According to the information and explanation given to us no
inventories were held during the year, therefore, the provisions of
paragraph 4(H) of CARO are not applicable to the Company.
3 According to the information and explanation given to us, the company
has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms or
other parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of
the companies Act, 1956.
4 According to the information and explanation given to us, the company
has taken unsecured loan from one party covered in the register
maintained u/s 301 of the companies Act 1956. The maximum amount
involved is Rs.2,51,00,495k The year end balance of loan taken is Rs.
1,98,65,495/-. The terms an. conditions on which loan was obtained are
not prime facie, prejudicial to the interest of the company. No
interest is being paid on such loan taken by the company. There is no
stipulation regarding repayment of such loan by the company.
5 In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control system commensurate
with the size of the company and nature of its business with regard to
purchases of inventory and sale of goods, and purchases of fixed assets
during the year.
6 According to the information and explanations given to us, we are of
the opinion that there are no transactions that need to be entered into
the register maintained under section 301 of the companies Act, 1956
exceeding the value of five lakhs rupees in the financial year.
7. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has not accepted deposits from the public
during the year.
8. As explained to us, the company is not having any internal audit
systems due to lack of business activities.
9. The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost
records by the company under section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act,
1956.
10 According to the information and explanations given to us, there is
no undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax,
sales tax, customs duty, service tax and excise duty is outstanding as
at 31.3.2010 for a period of more than six months from the date they
became payable.
According to the information and explanations given to us, disputed
Sales Tax that have not been deposited are as follows:
Name of
Statute Nature of Dues Amount (Rs.) Period
to Forum where
Which Amt dispute is
Relates Pending
KESL Vs
Dy..
Comm. Disputed
Trade Tax Rs. 1,33,46,653/- 1990-91 Joint Comm.
Trade
of Trade
Tax, Noida. Tax
(Appeal)
Noida
KESL Vs
Dy.
Comm. Disputed
Trade Tax Rs. 99,697/- 1996-97 Member of
Trade Tax
of Trade
Tax,
(Appeals) Tribunal,
Noida (U.P)
11. The accumulated losses of the Company, are more than fifty percent
of its net worth. The company has incurred cash losses during the
financial year covered by our audit and immediately preceding financial
year.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, there
were no dues payable to any financial institutions, banks or debenture
holders during the year.
13. According to information and explanation given to us, the company
has not granted Loans and advances on the basis of security by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
14. The company is not a chit fund, nidhi or mutual benefit
fund/Society.
15. The company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities
debentures and other investments.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not raised any term loans during the year.
18. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
funds raised by the company on the short term basis have not been used
for long term investment and vice versa,
19. The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
20. The company has not issued any debentures during the year.
21. The company has not made any public issue during the year.
22. According to the information and explanations given to us, any
fraud on or by the company has not been notice or reported during the
year.
For GUPTA & JHUNJHUNWALA
Chartered Accountants
(Registration No.003849N)
(MUKESH OUA)
Partner
Membership No.85323
Date : September 28, 2010
Place: New Delhi
Mar 31, 2009
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of M/s Krisons Electronic
Limited as at 31.03.2009 and the profit & loss Account for the year
ended on that date. annexed thereto and cash flow statement for the
period ended on that date. These financial statements ate the
responsibility of the company management Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on theses financial statements based on a our audit.
1. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing Standards
generally accepted in India. Those standards require float we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining on a test basis evidence supporting the amounts and
discloses in financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and estimates made by the management as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
2.As required by the companies (Auditor's Report) order 2003 issued by
the central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section
227 of the Companies Act, 1956, and on the basis of such checks as we
considered appropriate and according to the information and
explanations given to us. We enclose in the Annexure a statement on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said Order.
3. Further to our comments in paragraph 2 above, we state that
a) We have obtained all the information's and explanations which to the
best our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the company, so far as, appears from our examination of the
audit company, so tar
C) The Balance Sheet and the profit and Loss Account referred to in
this report in agreement with the books of account.
d) in our opinion, the Balance Sheet and the Profit & Loss Account
complies with the mandatory accounting standards except Accounting
standard 15 on accounting for retirement benefits as referred to in
section (3C) of the companies Act, 1956.
e) In our opinions and based on information's and explanations given to
us, of the Director are disqualified as at 31st March, 2009 being
appointed as Director of sections 274(i) (g) of the companies Act,
1956.
f) We draw attention to Note No. 1 in schedule 11 regarding the net
worth of the company.
g) No provision for doubtful debts and loans & advances amounting to
Rs.3.65,80,201A have been made (Refer Note No.4).
h) In view of the significance of our observations in Para (0 & (g)
above, we are of the opinion that the said accounts DO NOT GIVE a true
and fair view:-
(a) In the case of the Balance Sheet of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31st March. 2009 -
(b) In the case of Profit & Loss Account of the loss for the year ended
on 31st March, 2009.
(c) In so far as it relates to the Cash Flow Statement of the cash flow
of the Company for the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO AUDITORS' REPORT
1, The company has reconstructed the Fixed Assets Register as per the
records and information available with them and the same has been
placed before us for our verification. The Plant & Machinery were not
used for long and have become obsolete and have therefore been written
off in the books. The other fixed assets have been physically verified
by the management and no discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
There was no substantial disposal of fixed assets during the year.
2. The company has started tad activities during Ws financial years.
The goods' purchased for resale have been sold during the year. There
was no opening and closing stocks during the year.
3, As informed, the company has not granted any loans, secured or
unsecured to companies, firms or other parties listed in the register
maintained under section 301 of the companies Act, 1956
4. The company has taken an unsecured loan from one Party covered in
the register maintained u/s 301 of the companies Act 1956. The maximum
amount involved is Rs.2,48,20,495/-. The year end balance of loan
taken is Rs.2,48,20,495/-. The terms and conditions on which loan was
obtained are not prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the
company. No interest is being paid on such loan taken by the company.
There is no stipulation regarding repayment of such loan by the
company.
5. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there is adequate internal control systems commensurate
with the size of the company and nature of its business with regard to
purchase of inventory and sale of goods. There were no purchase of
fixed assets during the year.
6.According to the information and explanations given to us we are of
the opinion that are no transactions that need to be entered into the
register maintained under section 301 of the companies Act, 1956
exceeding the value of five lakhs rupees in the financial year.
7.In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
give, to us, the company has not accepted deposited from the public
during the year.
8.As explained to us, the company is not having any internal audit
systems due to lack of activity
9.The central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost
records by the company under section 209(1) (d) of the companies Act,
1956
10.According to the information and explanations given to us, except
for Rs.1,30,933,12 regarding sales payable by the company, no
undisputed payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax sales tax,
customs duty and excise duty is outstanding as at 31.03.2009 for a
period of more than six months from the date they become payable.
According to the information and explanations given to us, disputed
sales Tax that have not been deposited are as follows:
Name of
statute Nature of dues Amount Period to Forum Where
which amt dispute is
Relates Pending
KESL Vs Dy
Comm Disputed
Trade Tax Rs 1,33,46,653 1990-91 Joint Comm
Trades
Of trade Tax
Noida Tax
(Approval)
Noids
KESL Vs Dy.
Comm Disputed
Trade Tax Rs. 99.697 1996-97 Member
of trade
Tax
of trade
Tax
(Appeals) Tribunal
Noida(U.P)
11. The Accumulated losses of the company are more than fifty percent
of its net worth. The company has incurred cash losses during the
financial year covered by our audit and immediately preceding financial
year.
12. As informed there were no dues payable to any financial
institutions banks or debentures holders during the year
13.According to information and explanation given to us, the company
has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by way of
pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
14. The company is not a chit fund, radhi or mutual benefit
fund/Society.
15. The company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities
debentures and other investments.
16 According to the information and explanations given to us. the
company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us. the
company has not raised any term loans during the year.
18 According to the information and explanations given to us/the funds
raised by the company on the short term basis have not been used for
long term investment and vice versa.
19 The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in the Register maintained under section
301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
20. The company has not issued any debentures during the year.
21 The company has not made any public issue during the year.
22. According to the information and explanations given to us, any fraud
on or by the company has not been noticed or reported during the year.
for GUPTA & JHUNJHUNWALA
Chartered Accountants
(MUKESHDUA)
Partner
Membership No.85323
Date: August25,2009
Place: Mew Delhi
Mar 31, 2008
We have audited, the attached Balance sheet of M/S krisons electronic
system limited as at 31.03.2008 and the Profit S Loss Account for the
year ended or that date. annexed thereto and cash flow statement for
the period ended on that date ,these financial statements or the
responsibility of the Company's management. period ended on that data.
These financial statements cased on our audit, Out responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statement based on our audit .
1.We conducted our Audit, in accordance with Auditing standards
generally accepted in India those standard require that we plan and
perform the audit reasonable assurance to about whether the finical
statements are free of material misstatements an audit includes
examining on a test basis evidence supporting the amounts and discloses
in financial statements an audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and estimates made by the managements as well as
evaluation the overall financial statements presentation we believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
2.As required by the companies (auditor's report) order 2003 issued by
that central movement of India in terms of sub-section (4a) of section
277 of the complains act 1956 on the basis of such checks as we
considered appropriate and according to the information and
explanations given to us we enclose in the annexure a statements on the
matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said order,
3 Further to our comments in paragraph 2 above, we state that:
a) we have obtained all the information and explanation, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit.
b)in our opinion, proper book of account as repaired by law have been
Kept by the company, so far as appears from our examination of the
audit.
c) The Balance Sheet and the Profit and Loss Account referred to in
this report are in agreement with the books of account.
d)in our opinion. the balance sheet and the profit and loss account
complies with mandatory accounting standards except accounting standard
15 on accounting for retirement benefits as referred to in Section 211
(3C) of the Companies Act, 1956.
e)in our opinion, and based on information and explanations given to
us. none of the directors are disqualified as at 31st march, 2008 from
being appointed as directors in terms of section 274(1) (g) of the
Companies act 1956.
f) We draw attention to Note No.1 in scheduled 8 regarding the net
worth of the company
g)No provision for doubtful debts and loans & advances amounting to
rs.3,65,80, 201/- have been made(refer note no.4)
h) In view of the Significance of our observation in Para (f) & (g)
above, we are of the opinion that the said Accounts DO NOT GIVE a true
and faire view:-
a) In the case of to Balance Sheet of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31st March, 2008
b) In the case of profit & loss Account of the loss for the year ended
on 31st March , 2008
c) In so far as it relates to the cash flow statement of the cash flow
of the company for the year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE
1.the premises of company b-98 and d-57 sector-11 naiad (up) were
soiled by sales tax authorities in earlier years. Due to sealing of
premises the plant & machinery situated at these premises were not used
and became obsolete and have therefore been written off in the books
accordingly the fixed Assets Register it so untraceable as informed
by the management.
2.The company is not carrying, at present an, stock of materials
components & spares.
3. The company has not granted any loans to companies firms and other
parties listed in the register maintained under section 301 of the
companies Act, 1956
4. The company has taken an unsecured loan from parties covered in
the register maintained u/s 301 of the companies Act, 1956 The Maximum
amount involved Rs.2,44,17,495/- The year end balance of loans taken is
Rs.2,44,17,495/- The terms and conditions on which loans was obtained
are not prima facie, prejudicial to the interest of the company. No
interest is being paid on such loan taken by the company. There is no
stipulation regarding repayment of such loans by the company.
5.During the year there were no purchases of fixed assets and inventory.
6. According to the information and explanations given to us we are of
the opinion that there are no transactions that reed to be entered into
the register maintained under section 301 of the companies Act, 1956
exceeding the value of five lakhs rupees in the financial year.
7. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us, the company has not accepted deposits from the public
during the year.
8. As explained to us, the company is not having any internal audit
systems due to lack of activity.
9. The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost
records by the company under section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act,
1956.
10. According to the information and explanations given to us, except
for Rs.1,60,933.12 regarding sales tax payable by the company, no
undisputed amounts payable in respect of income tax, wealth tax, sales
tax, customs duty and excise duty is outstanding as at 31.03.2008 for a
period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
According to the information and explanations given to us, disputed
Sales Tax that have not been deposited are as follows:
Name of Statute Nature of Dues Amount(Rs) Period to Forum where
Which amt dispute is
Relates Pending
KESL Vs Dy disputed
trade
tax Rs.1,33.46,653/- 1990-91 Joint
Comm. Trade
comm Tax.
Nokia.
Tax (Appeal
Noxta
Kelsey Comm. Disputed
Trade
Tax Rs 99.697/- 1996-97 Member of
Trade
Tax
Tnbunal.
noida(UP)
11 The accumulated losses of the Company, are more than fifty percent
of its net worth. The incurred cash losses during the financial year
covered by our audit and immediately preceding financial year.
12.REcording to information and explanation given to us. the company
has not ranted loans and advance on the basis of security by way of
pledge of shares, debentures another security.
13. The company is not a chit fund, nidhi or mutual benefit
fund/Society.
14. The company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities
debentures and other investments.
15. According to the information and explanations given to us. the
company has not given any quarantine for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions: given any guarantee
16. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not raised any terms loans during the year.
17.according to the information and explanations given to us, the funds
raised by the company on the short term basis have not been used for
long term investment and vice versa.
18. The company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to
parties and companies covered in , the Register maintained under
section 301 of the Companies Act, 1%. '
19. The company has not issued any debentures during the year.
20. The company has not made any public issue during the year.
21. According to the information and explanations given to us, any
fraud on or by the company has not been noticed or reported during the
year.
for GUPTA & JHUNJHUNWALA
Chartered Accountants
(MUKESHDUA)
Partner
Membership No.85323
Date : September 05, 2008
Place: New Delhi
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article