Mar 31, 2010
1. We have audited the attached balance sheet of K.C. Textiles
Limited, as at 31st March 2010, the profit and loss account and also
the cash flow statement for the year ended on that date annexed
thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 issued
by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of
section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in theAnnexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to above.were port
that:
(I) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of
ouraudit;
(ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examinatiorrof
those books;
(iii) The balance sheet, profit and loss account and cash flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
(iv) In our opinion, the balance sheet, profit and loss account and
cash flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
(v) On the basis of written representations received from the
directors, as on 31st March, 2010 and taken on record by the Board of
Directors, we report that none of the directors is disqualified as on
31st March, 2010 from being appointed as a director in terms of clause
(g) of sub-section (1) of section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the
said date ;
(vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the accounts read together with Notes &
Significant Accounting Policies thereon give the information required
by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give a true
and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the balance sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31 st March, 2010;
(b) in the case of the profit and loss account, of the loss of the
company for the year ended on that date; and;
(c) in the case of the cash flow statement, of the cash flow for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors Report (REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3 OF
AUDITORS REPORT OF EVEN DATE)
(I) (a) The company has maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.
(b) All the assets have not been physically verified by the management
during the year but there is a regular programme of verification which,
in our opinion, is reasona- ble having regard to the size of the
company and the nature of its assets. No material discrepancies were
noticed on such verification.
(c) No fixed assets were disposed off during the year and hence the
going concern status of the company is not affected.
(ii)(a) The inventory has been physically verified at the end of the
year by the management. In our opinion, the frequency of verification
is reasonable.
(b) The procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
(c) The company is maintaining proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stocks and
the book records were not material.
(iii)(a)The company had taken loans from a company and a director
covered in the register under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
The maximum amount involved during the year was Rs. 58.86 Lakhs and the
year end balance of loan from a director was nil and from a company was
Rs.55.02 Lakhs.
(b) In our opinion, the rate of interest and other terms and conditions
on which loans were taken from the parties as listed in the Register
maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 are not, prima
facie, prejudicial to the interest of the company.
(c) As per information and explanations given to us there is no
stipulation for repayment of loans from the parties listed in the
Register maintained under section 301 of the CompaniesAct, 1956.
(d) There is no overdue amount of loans taken from the above parties as
listed in the Register maintained under section 301 of the
CompaniesAct, 1956.
(e) According to the information and explana- tions given to us, the
company has granted loan to a company listed in the register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies, Act,1956. The maximum amount
involved during the year was Rs.45.28 Lakhs and the year end balance
was Rs.45.28 Lakhs.
(f) According to the information & explanations given to us, the rate
of interest and other terms and conditions on which loan was given to
the company as listed in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956 are not prima-facie prejudicial to the interest
of the company.
(iv) In our opinion and according to the information & explanations
given to us, there are adequate internal company procedures
commensurate with the size of the company and nature of its business
with regard to purchase and sales of goods . Further on the basis of
our examination of the books & records of the company and according to
the information and explanations given to us, we have neither come
across nor we have been informed of any continuing failure to correct
major weaknesses in the aforesaid internal control procedures.
(v)(a) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
are of the opinion that the transactions that need to be entered into
the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
have been so entered in the register required to be maintained
underthis section.
(b) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us the transactions made in pursuance of contracts or
arrangements entered in the register maintained u/s 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956 and exceeding the value of Rs.5 Lakhs in respect of
any party during the year were made at prices which were reasonable
having regard to the prevailing market prices at the relevant time.
(vi) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the company has not accepted any deposits from the public
within the meaning of Section 58A and 58AA of the Companies Act, 1956,
and the Rules framed thereunder and any relevant provisions of the
Companies Act, 1956.
(vii) In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system
commensurate with the size and nature of its business.
(viii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made and maintained cost records prescribed by the
Central Government under section 209(1) (d) of the Companies Act, 1956
as there was no production of yarn etc. during the year.
(ix)(a)According to the information and explanations given to us and
the records of the company
examined by us, undisputed statutory dues including provident fund,
investor education and protection fund, employees state insurance,
income tax , sales tax, wealth tax, custom duty, service tax, cess and
excise duty have been generally regularly deposited with the
appropriate authorities for the year. However, old arrears of sales
tax, cess, listing fee, & provident fund as at the last day of the
financial year concerned for a period of more than 6 month from the
date they become payable, are given below:
Nature of Amount Before 01.04.2008 For the year
Statutory Dues (Rs. in |acs) (Rs. In lacs) (Rs. in lacs)
Listing Fee 1.1 1.13 0
b) According to the books of account and records as produced and
examined by us in accordance with the generally accepted auditing
practices in India there are no dues of Sales Tax, Wealth Tax, Service
Tax and Cess which have not been deposited on account of any dispute.
The particulars of dues of Municipal Tax as at 31st March, 2010 which
have not been deposited on account of a dispute are as follows:
Nature of Statutory
Dues Forum where Dispute is Pending Amount
(Rs.In Lacs)
Municipal Tax Municipal Corporation Jind, Haryana 4.81
(x) The accumulated losses of the Company exceed 50% of its networth as
at the end of the financial year. The Company has incurred cash losses
in the current year though not in the immediately preceding financial
year.
(xi) Based on our audit and on the basis of information and
explanations given to us, the company has not obtained any borrowings
from banks, financial institutions or by way of debentures, hence our
comments are not required.
(xii) Based on our examination of documents and records and as per
information and explanations given to us, we are of the opinion that
the company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) In our opinion, the company is not a chit fund or a nidhi mutual
benefit fund/society and hence the provisions of clause 4 (xiii) of the
Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003 are not applicable to the
company.
(xiv) In our opinion, the company is not dealing in or trading in
shares, securities, debentures and other investments. Accordingly, the
provisions of clause 4 (xiv) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order,
2003 are not applicable to the company.
(xv) In our opinion and as per information and explanations given to us
the company has not given any guarantees for loan taken by others from
banks or financial institutions.
(xvi) In our opinion, the term loans have been applied for the purpose
for which they were raised.
(xvii) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, and on an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the
Company, we report that no funds raised on short-term basis have been
utilized for long-term investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the companies Act, 1956.
(xix) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
debentures have been issued by the Company during the year.
(xx) Based on our examination of books and records of the Company, no
public issue was made by the Company during the year.
(xxi) During the course of our examination of the books of account
carried out in accordance with the generally accepted auditing
practices in India, we have not come across any instance of fraud on or
by the Company nor have we been informed by the management of any such
instance being noticed or reported during the year.
For JAGDISH SAPRA & CO.
(FRN 001378N)
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
(CA VIPAL KALRA)
NEW DELHI PARTNER
Dated : 14th Aug. 2010 M.NO. 084583
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article