Mar 31, 2014
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Assam
Petro-Chemicals Limited ("the Company"), which comprise the Balance
Sheet as at March 31, 2014, and the Statement of Profit and Loss and
Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management''s Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these financial
statements that give a true and fair view of the financial position,
financial performance and cash flows of the Company in accordance with
the Accounting Standards referred to in sub- section (3C) of section
211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") which shall continue to
apply in respect of section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013 in terms of
General Circular 15/2013 dated September 13, 2013 issued by the
Ministry of Corporate Affairs. This responsibility includes the
design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to
the preparation and presentation of the financial statements that give
a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
Auditor''s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to
obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor''s
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or
error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal
control relevant to the Company''s preparation and fair presentation of
the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity''s internal control. An
audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our qualified audit opinion.
Basis for Qualified Opinion
(i) Amortization of ROC fees Expenses:
Expenses related to ROC fees for enhancement of authorised share
capital total amounting to Rs. 1,66,50,510 had been amortized as per
decision of the management in the Financial Year 2012-13 and
accordingly Rs. 33,30,102 (Refer Note 9.C) has been charged under
Depreciation and Amortization expenses in the current year and balance
amount Rs. 99,90,306 shown as Unamortized Expenses under Other
Non-Current Assets (Refer Note 11). On the basis of Accounting Standard
(AS)-26 Para 56 under The Companies Accounting Standards Rules, 2006,
the whole expenses related to ROC fees for enhancement of authorised
share capital of Rs. 1,66,50,510 should have been charged to Statement
of Profit and Loss as reported last year in our Audit Report. ROC fees
expenses neither created any tangible asset nor any intangible asset.
Thus, on the basis of above Accounting Standard (AS)-26 Para 56 whole
of the balance amount Rs. 1,33,20,408 should have been charged to
Statement of Profit and Loss under ''Prior Period Items''. This has
resulted in overstatement of Profit and Other Current Assets by Rs.
99,90,306
(ii) Provision for Pay revision of Arrear salaries of employees for the
Year 2009-10 & 2010-11 :
As mentioned in CAG comments on the accounts for the year 2012-13, Rs.
6,27,54,977 being the arrear payable against pay revision of salaries
of employees for the years 2009-10 & 2010-11 should have been provided
for and shown under ''Current Liabilities'' instead of disclosing it
under ''Contingent Liabilities'' as the same was approved by the Board of
Directors of the Company and Government of Assam.
But no provision has been made by the company charging to Statement of
Profit and Loss Rs. 6,27,54,977 as ''Prior period Items and shown under
''Short-term provisions''. This has resulted in overstatement of Profit
by Rs. 6,27,54,977 and understatement of Short-term provisions by Rs.
6,27,54,977.
(iii) Unused Old catalyst not written off:
As per Note no. 25.9 "The Company is carrying unused catalyst valued
Rs. 65,97,535 which is more than 20 years old. A committee has been
constituted for disposal of the same. The loss/gain on sale will be
accounted for at the time of disposal." The company has not identified
& charged to Statement of Profit and Loss, the loss on impairment of
above asset.
Moreover, As mentioned in CAG comments for the year 2011-12, formal
order by the Managing Director of the company had been issued for
treating old catalyst worth Rs. 20,12,234 as obsolete on 26/11/2004 as
reported last year in our Audit Report.
On the basis of above, in our opinion, the company should have charged
to Statement of Profit and Loss Rs. 45,85,301as ''Other Expenses'' and
Rs. 20,12,234 as ''Priorperiod Items''. This has resulted in
overstatement of Profit and Inventory by Rs. 65,97,535.
(iv) The total effect of the qualification in Para (i), (ii) & (iii)
above is that the Profit has been overstated by Rs. 7,93,42,818 and
overstatement of ''Other Current Assets'' by Rs. 99,90,306 and
''Inventory'' by Rs. 65,97,535 and understatement of ''Short-term
provisions'' by Rs. 6,27,54,977.
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter
described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the financial
statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2014;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the profit for
the year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Emphasis of Matter
(i) We draw attention to Note 3(v) and Note 24.1 to the financial
statements related to Equity capital money received from Government of
Assam amounting Rs. 1702 lakhs shown under Share Application money
pending allotment for which legal formalities relating to issue of
share capital will be taken by the Board in due course as mentioned in
above notes. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.
(ii) We draw attention to Note No. 25.11 to the financial statements.
The documents in respect of Subsidiary Company (Pragjyotish Fertilizers
and Chemicals Ltd. (PFCL) required to be attached with the Balance
Sheet of this Company as per section 212(1) of the Companies Act, 1956,
have not been attached. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of this
matter.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 ("the
Order") issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss, and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. except for the matter described in the basis for qualified opinion
Paragraph, in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and
Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards
referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act,
1956;
e. The provisions of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956
regarding "Disqualifications of Directors" do not apply to this
company, being a Government Company, as per notification No. G.S.R. 829
(E) dated 21.10.2003 issued by the Ministry of Company Affairs,
Government of India;
f. Since the Central Government has not issued any notification as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the
Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section,
prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due
and payable by the Company.
ANNEXURE TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'' REPORT
[Annexure referred to in paragraph under ''Report on other legal and
Regulatory requirements'' section of our report of even date on the
accompanying financial statements of ASSAM PETRO-CHEMICALS LIMITED for
the year ended on 31st March, 2014]
(I) (a) The Company has not maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets.The records maintained for a part period do not tally with the
financial statements.
(b) According to the information given to us, Physical verification of
fixed assets has not been done by the management during the year and as
such material discrepancies with financial records, if any, could not
be noticed and have not been dealt with in the books of account.
(c) The Company has not disposed off substantial part of fixed assets
during the year and thus the going concern concept of the Company has
not been affected.
(ii) (a) As explained to us the inventories of Stores and Spares have
been physically verified by the management. In our opinion, the
frequency of verification is reasonable.
(b) In accordance with the information and explanations given to us,
the procedures of physical verification of inventory followed by the
management appear to be reasonable and adequate in relation to the size
of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of the inventory records, in our
opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared
with book records were not material considering the size of the company
and the nature of its business.
(iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to its subsidiary M/s
Pragjyotish Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited which is Rs. 41,84,185 and
advance for Share Application Money to the Subsidiary Company is Rs.
4,80,000 as on 31st March, 2014. The Company has made provision for the
full amount i.e. Rs. 41,84,185 & Rs. 4,80,000 respectively considering
them doubtful.
(b) The Company had also granted loans to Assam Tea Corporation Limited
as per details given in Note No. 25.10. As per above details, the
repayment of principal of loan II was received on 22.10.2009 against
the due date of 10.04.2009 and the interest due Rs. 4,25,686 has not
been received so far. In case of loan I, out of principal Rs. 35,00,000
, Rs. 10,00,000 only was received on 17.03.2011 against the due date of
07.08.2007.The Balance amount of principal of Rs. 25,00,000 is still
overdue. Interest accrued and due Rs. 26,76,856 has not been received
so far. Though the Company is pursuing through Govt. of Assam for the
recovery of the balance amount of principal and the amount of interest
overdue, however the steps are not reasonable in view of long overdues.
(c) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or
other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act,1956 and as such, clauses (iii)(e), (f) & (g) of para
4 of the Order are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given
to us, except non-maintenance of Fixed Asset register, no physical
verification of Fixed Assets, there is an adequate internal control
system commensurate with size of the company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the sale
of goods. We are not giving our opinion on the effectiveness of the
entity''s internal control. As informed to us, steps have been taken to
correct weaknesses in Internal Control System but still the weaknesses
persist.
(v) According to the information and explanations given by the
management, there are no transactions that need to be entered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act'' 1956.
(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during the year
and hence directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and provisions
of sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of Companies
Act,1956 and the rules framed there under are not applicable.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the Cost records maintained by the
company pursuant to the Companies ( Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011
prescribed by the Central Government under section 209 (1) (d) of the
Companies Act, 1956, for maintenance of Cost records and we are of the
opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been
made and maintained.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
as per the records of the company, the company has been generally
regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident
Fund, Income tax, Sales tax, VAT, Custom duty, Excise duty and other
statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us there is
no material amount of the disputed tax etc. which are not deposited
with appropriate authority as at 31st March''2014. However, the Company
has received certain demands and show cause notices for payment of duty
and penalty as detailed in Note No. 24.02.
(x) As per the records of the company, the company has accumulated
Losses of Rs. 60.60 lakhs (Previous year Rs. 842.11 lakhs) as at 31st
March''2014 and the Company has not incurred any cash losses in the
financial year ended on that date or in the immediate preceding
financial year.
(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to the bank, and the
Company has not taken any loans from any financial institutions.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) The Company is not a chit fund/nidhi/mutual benefit/ society.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not obtained any term loan during the year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
report that the funds raised on short-term basis have not been used for
long-term investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during year.
For L. K. Kejriwal & Co. (CA. Samta Agarwal)
Place: Guwahati Chartered Accountants Partner
Date: 04/08/2014 Firm Registration No. 001368C Membership No. 068296
Mar 31, 2013
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying fi nancial statements of Assam
Petro-Chemicals Limited ("the CompanyÂ), which comprise the Balance
Sheet as at March 31, 2013, and the Statement of Profi t and Loss and
Cash Flow Statement for the year then ended, and a summary of signifi
cant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
ManagementÂs Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation of these fi nancial
statements that give a true and fair view of the fi nancial position,
fi nancial performance and cash fl ows of the Company in accordance
with the Accounting Standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of
section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the ActÂ). This
responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of
internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of the fi
nancial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
AuditorÂs Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these fi nancial
statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with the Standards on Auditing issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. Those Standards require that we comply with
ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the fi nancial statements are free
from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to
obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the fi
nancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditorÂs
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the fi nancial statements, whether due to fraud or
error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal
control relevant to the CompanyÂs preparation and fair presentation of
the fi nancial statements in order to design audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
the accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall presentation of the fi nancial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suffi cient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our qualifi ed audit opinion.
Basis for Qualifi ed Opinion
(i) Amortisation of ROC fees Expenses:
Expenses related to ROC fees for enhancement of authorised share
capital total amounting Rs. 1,66,50,510 /- has been amortised as per
decision of the management and accordingly Rs. 33,30,102/-(Refer Note
9.C) has been charged under Depreciation and Amortisation expenses and
balance amount Rs. 1,33,20,408/- shown as Unamortised Expenses under
Other Non-Current Assets (Refer Note 11). On the basis of Accounting
Standard (AS)-26 Para 56 under The Companies Accounting Standards
Rules, 2006, in our opinion, the whole expense related to ROC fees for
enhancement of authorised share capital Rs. 1,66,50,510/- should have
been charged to Statement of Profi t and Loss. This has resulted in
overstatement of Profi t and Other Current Assets by Rs. 1,33,20,408/-
(ii) Methanol Revamping Expenses:
Feasibility Study Expenses Rs. 40,32,106/- relating to Methanol
Revamping Expenses shown under capital work in progress and Health
Study Expenses Rs. 43,65,589/- relating to Methanol
evamping Expenses shown under Long term loans and advances for which
the Board had taken decision on 25-08-2010 that no further action will
be taken for implementation of 30 % Methanol Expansion scheme of the
existing Methanol Plant. Based on the decision taken by the Board on
25.08.2010, in our opinion, the whole expense related to Methanol
Revamping Expenses Rs.83,97,695 /- should have been charged to
Statement of Profi t and Loss. This has resulted in overstatement of
Profi t by Rs. 83,97,695/-, capital work in progress by Rs. 40,32,106/-
and Long term loans and advances by Rs. 43,65,589/-.
(iii) Provision for Pay revision shown under exceptional items:
Provision for Pay Revision (Arrear Salary) - Rs.6,55,61,915/- and
Arrear Contribution to PF Rs. 1,07,83,211/- have been shown under
exceptional items (Refer Note 23B). Based on discussions made in Para
14 & Para 16 of the Accounting Standard (AS) -5 under The Companies
Accounting Standards Rules, 2006 and Para 9.6 of the Guidance Note on
the Revised Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956, in our opinion ''the
amount should have been shown under Employees benefi ts expensesÂ. This
resulted in ''understatement of employees benefi ts expenses by
Rs.7,63,45,126/- and overstatement of ''exceptional items by Rs.
7,63,45,126/-
(iv) Unused Old catalyst not written off :
As per Note no. 25.10 "The Company is carrying unused catalyst valued
Rs. 65,97,535/- which is more than 20 years old. A committee has been
constituted for disposal of the same. The loss/gain on sale will be
accounted for at the time of disposal. The company has not identifi ed
& charged to Statement of Profi t and Loss, the loss on impairment of
above asset.
Moreover, As mentioned in CAG comments for the year 2011-12, formal
order by the Managing Director of the company had been issued for
treating old catalyst worth Rs. 20,12,234.00 as obsolete on 26/11/2004.
On the basis of above, in our opinion, the company should have charge
to Statement of Profi t and Loss Rs.45,85,301/- as ''Other Expenses and
Rs. 20,12,234/- as ''Prior period ItemsÂ. This has resulted in
overstatement of Profi t and Inventory by Rs. 65,97,535/-
(v) The Total effect of the qualifi cations in Para (i), (ii) & (iv)
above is that the Profi t has been overstated by Rs.2,83,15,638/- and
overstatement of ''other Current Assets by Rs. 1,33,20,408/-, ''capital
work in progress by Rs. 40,32,106/- , ''Long term loans and advancesÂ
by Rs. 43,65,589/- and ''Inventory by Rs. 65,97,535/-. The effect of
qualifi cations in Para (iii) above is inter-se in the statement of
Profi t & Loss and has no effect on Profi t for the year in the
statement of Profi t & Loss and on the Balance Sheet.
Qualifi ed Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the
explanations given to us, except for the effects of the matter
described in the Basis for Qualifi ed Opinion paragraph, the fi nancial
statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so
required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the
accounting principles generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2013;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profi t and Loss, of the profi t
for the year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash fl ows for the
year ended on that date.
Emphasis of Matter
(i) We draw attention to Note 3(v) and Note 24.1 to the fi nancial
statements related to Equity capital money received during the year
from Government of Assam amounting Rs. 1702 lakhs shown under Share
Application money pending allotment for which legal formalities
relating to issue of share capital will be taken by the Board in due
course as mentioned in above notes. Our opinion is not qualifi ed in
respect of this matter.
(ii) We draw attention to Note No. 25.12 to the fi nancial statements.
The documents in respect of Subsidiary Company (Pragjyotish Fertilizers
and Chemicals Ltd. (PFCL) required to be attached with the Balance
Sheet of this Company as per section 212(1) of the Companies Act, 1956,
have not been attached. Our opinion is not qualifi ed in respect of
this matter.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (AuditorÂs Report) Order, 2003 ("the
OrderÂ) issued by the Central Government of India in terms of
sub-section (4A) of section 227 of the Act, we give in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specifi ed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
2. As required by section 227(3) of the Act, we report that:
a. we have obtained all the information and explanations which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit;
b. in our opinion proper books of account as required by law have been
kept by the Company so far as appears from our examination of those
books;
c. the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profi t and Loss, and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of
account;
d. except for the matter described in the basis for qualifi ed opinion
Paragraph, in our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profi t and
Loss, and Cash Flow Statement comply with the Accounting Standards
referred to in subsection (3C) of section 211 of the Companies Act,
1956;
e. The provisions of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956
regarding "Disqualifi cations of Directors do not apply to this
company, being a Government Company, as per notifi cation No. G.S.R.
829 (E) dated 21.10.2003 issued by the Ministry of Company Affairs,
Government of India;
f. Since the Central Government has not issued any notifi cation as to
the rate at which the cess is to be paid under section 441A of the
Companies Act, 1956 nor has it issued any Rules under the said section,
prescribing the manner in which such cess is to be paid, no cess is due
and payable by the Company.
ANNEXURE TO THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORSÂ REPORT
[Annexure referred to in paragraph under ''Report on other legal and
Regulatory requirements section of our report of even date on the
accompanying fi nancial statements of ASSAM PETRO-CHEMICALS LIMITED for
the year ended on 31st March, 2013]
(i) (a) The Company has not maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fi xed
assets. The records maintained for a part period do not tally with the
fi nancial statements.
(b) According to the information given to us, Physical verifi cation of
fi xed assets has not been done by the management during the year and
as such material discrepancies with fi nancial records, if any, could
not be noticed and have not been dealt with in the books of account.
(c) The Company has not disposed off substantial part of fi xed assets
during the year and thus the going concern concept of the Company has
not been affected.
(ii) (a) As explained to us the inventories of Stores and Spares have
been physically verifi ed by the management during the year. In our
opinion, the frequency of verifi cation is reasonable.
(b) In accordance with the information and explanations given to us,
the procedures of physical verifi cation of inventory followed by the
management appear to be reasonable and adequate in relation to the size
of the Company and the nature of its business.
(c) On the basis of our examination of the inventory records, in our
opinion, the Company has maintained proper records of inventory. The
discrepancies noticed on physical verifi cation of inventory as
compared with book records were not material considering the size of
the company and the nature of its business.
(iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to its subsidiary M/s
Pragjyotish Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited which is Rs.38,36,585/- and
advance for Share Application Money to the Subsidiary Company is
Rs.4,80,000/- as on 31st March, 2013. The Company has made provision for
the full amount i.e. Rs.38,36,585/- & Rs.4,80,000/- respectively
considering them doubtful.
(b) The Company had also granted loans to Assam Tea Corporation Limited
as per details given in Note No. 25.11. As per above details, the
repayment of principal of loan II was received on 22.10.2009 against
the due date of 10.04.2008 and the interest due Rs.5,15,671/- has not
been received so far. In case of loan I, out of principal Rs.35,00,000/-,
Rs.10,00,000/- only was received on 17.03.2011 against the due date of
07.08.2007. The Balance amount of principal of Rs.25,00,000/- is still
overdue. Interest accrued and due Rs. 27,49,005/- has not been received
so far. Though the Company is pursuing through Govt. of Assam for the
recovery of the balance amount of principal and the amount of interest
overdue, however the steps are not reasonable in view of long overdues.
(c) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, fi rms
or other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301
of the Companies Act,1956 and as such, clauses (iii)(e), (f) & (g) of
para 4 of the Order are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given
to us, except non-maintenance of Fixed Asset register, no physical
verifi cation of Fixed Assets, there is an adequate internal control
system commensurate with size of the company and the nature of its
business for the purchase of inventory, fi xed assets and for the sale
of goods. As informed to us, steps have been taken to correct
weaknesses in Internal Control System but still the weaknesses persist.
(v) According to the information and explanations given by the
management, there are no transactions that need to be entered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act 1956.
(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during the year
and hence directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and provisions
of sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of Companies
Act,1956 and the rules framed there under are not applicable.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the Cost records maintained by the
company pursuant to the Companies (Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011
prescribed by the Central Government under section 209 (1) (d) of the
Companies Act, 1956, for maintenance of Cost records and we are of the
opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been
made and maintained.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
as per the records of the company, the company has been generally
regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including Provident
Fund, Income tax, Sales tax, VAT, Custom duty, Excise duty and other
statutory dues with the appropriate authorities during the year.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us there is
no material amount of the disputed tax etc. which are not deposited
with appropriate authority as at 31st March ''2013. However, the
Company has received certain demands and show cause notices for payment
of duty and penalty as detailed in Note No. 24.02.
(x) As per the records of the Company, the Company has accumulated
Losses of Rs.791.79 lakhs (Previous year Rs.1130.02 lakhs) as at 31st
March, 2013 and the Company has not ncurred any cash losses in the
financial year ended on that date or in the immediate preceding fi
nancial year. (xi) According to the information and explanations given
to us the Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to the bank,
and the Company has not taken any loans from any fi nancial
institutions. (xii) According to the information and explanations
given to us, the Company has not granted any loans and advances on the
basis of security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other
securities.
(xiii) The Company is not a chit fund/nidhi/mutual benefi t/ society.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or fi nancial institutions.
(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not obtained any term loan during the year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
report that the funds raised on short-term basis have not been used for
long-term investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during year.
For L. K. Kejriwal & Co.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No. 001368C
Sd/-
(CA. Samta Agarwal)
Partner
Membership No. 068296
Place: Guwahati
Date: 25/09/2013
Mar 31, 2012
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of ASSAM PETRO-CHEMICALS
LIMITED as at 31st March, 2012, and also the Statement of Profit and
Loss and the Cash Flow Statement for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the company''s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor''s Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) issued by the Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A)
of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a
statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the said
Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above , we report that :
I. The documents in respect of Subsidiary Company (Pragjyotish
Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. (PFCL) required to be attached with the
Balance Sheet of this Company as per section 212(1) of the Companies
Act, 1956, have not been attached. (Refer Note No. 28.20)
II. Changes in the Significant Accounting Policies
During the year, there is a change in the Accounting Policy relating to
charging off the value of catalyst in the Profit & Loss A/c. As per
disclosure in Note No. 11 relating to ''Other Non- Current Assets,'' "The
value of Catalyst in the plant has been taken on the basis of
Certificate issued by the Engineering Department of the company. This
has been amortised as per production capacity i.e. 1,00,000 MT, which
is a variation of the accounting treatment of earlier years. The impact
of variation on Statement of Profit & Loss is increase in profit by f
1,35,57,828/-."
III. Unused old catalyst held for disposal
As per Note No. 28.15 "The company is carrying unused catalyst valued
Rs. 65.98 lakhs which is more than 20 years old. A committee has been
constituted for disposal of the same. The loss / gain on sale will be
accounted for at the time of disposal". The Company has not identified
& charged to Profit & Loss Account, the loss, if any, on impairment of
above asset.
IV. Fixed Asset - Replacement of Reformer Tubes
The Company has replaced 42 Nos. of imported reformer tubes costing f
3,90,83,964/- in reformer section of the Methanol Plant, which has been
capitalized by the Company considering the replacement as to be
"betterment or improvement" as given in Note No. 28.13. The reasoning
given by the management in above note No. 28.13 is very complex and
highly technical. Thus we are not able to express an opinion on the
above accounting treatment made by the Company.
Subject to above
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our
audit;
ii) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have
been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books;
iii) The Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and Cash Flow
statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
account;
iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet, Statement of Profit and Loss and
Cash Flow statement dealt with by this report comply with the
accounting standards referred to in sub-section (3C) of section 211 of
the Companies Act, 1956;
v) The provisions of Section 274(1)(g) of the Companies Act, 1956
regarding "Disqualifications of Directors" do not apply to this
company, being a Government Company, as per notification No. G.S.R. 829
(E) dated 21.10.2003 issued by the Ministry of Company Affairs,
Government of India;
vi) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts read together with the
Significant Accounting Policies and notes thereon give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India:
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
company as at 31st March, 2012;
(b) in the case of the Statement of Profit and Loss, of the Loss for
the year ended on that date; and
(c) in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
ANNEXURE TO THE DRAFT AUDITORS'' REPORT
[Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of our report of even date on the
accounts of ASSAM PETRO- CHEMICALS LIMITED for the year ended on 31st
March, 2012]
(i)
(a) The Company has not maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets. The records maintained for a part period do not tally with the
financial statements.
(b) According to the information given to us, Physical verification of
fixed assets has not been done by the management during the year and as
such material discrepancies with financial records, if any, could not
be noticed and have not been dealt with in the books of account.
(c) The Company has not disposed off substantial part of fixed assets
during the year and thus the going concern concept of the Company has
not been affected.
(ii) According to the information given to us, physical verification of
Inventory has not been conducted by management during the year and as
such material discrepancies, if any, could not be noticed. An audit
firm was appointed to conduct stock audit. They submitted their report
pointing out irregularities in the stock records. As informed to us,
steps have been taken/ are being taken to regularise those
irregularities.
(iii) (a) The Company has granted loan to its subsidiary M/s
Pragjyotish Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited which is Rs. 38,36,585 as
on 31st March, 2012. Further, advance for Share Application Money to
the Subsidiary Company is Rs. 4,80,000 as on 31st March, 2012. The
Company has made provision for the full amount i.e. Rs. 38,36,585 & Rs.
4,80,000 respectively considering them doubtful.
(b)The Company had also granted loans to Assam Tea Corporation Limited
as per details given in Note No. 28.14. As per above details, the
repayment of principal of loan II was received on 22.10.2009 against
the due date of 10.04.2008 and the interest due Rs. 1,45,941 has not
been received so far. In case of loan I, out of principal Rs.
35,00,000, Rs. 10,00,000 only was received on 16.03.2011 against the
due date of 07.08.2007. The Balance amount of principal of Rs.
25,00,000 is still overdue. Interest accrued and due Rs. 19,76,045 has
not been received so far. Though the Company is pursuing through Govt.
of Assam for the recovery of the balance amount of principal and the
amount of interest overdue, however the steps are not reasonable in
view of long overdues.
(c) According to information and explanations given to us, the Company
has not taken any loans, secured or unsecured, from companies, firms or
other parties covered in the register maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act,1956 and as such, clauses (iii)(e), (f) & (g) of para
4 of the Order are not applicable.
(iv) In our opinion and according to information and explanations given
to us, except non- maintenance of Fixed Asset register, no physical
verification of Fixed Assets & Inventory, there is an adequate internal
control system commensurate with size of the company and the nature of
its business for the purchase of inventory, fixed assets and for the
sale of goods. As informed to us, steps have been taken to correct
weaknesses in Internal Control System but still the weaknesses persist.
(v) According to the information and explanations given by the
management, there are no transactions that need to be entered in the
register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act'' 1956.
(vi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not accepted any deposits from the public during the year
and hence directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and provisions
of sections 58A, 58AA or any other relevant provisions of Companies
Act,1956 and the rules framed there under are not applicable.
(vii) In our opinion, the Company has an internal audit system
commensurate with its size and nature of its business but the scope of
internal audit has not been defined and the Internal Audit Report is
not comprehensive.
(viii) We have broadly reviewed the Cost records maintained by the
company pursuant to the Companies ( Cost Accounting Records) Rules 2011
prescribed by the Central Government under section 209 (1) (d) of the
Companies Act, 1956, for maintenance of Cost records and we are of the
opinion that prima facie the prescribed accounts and records have been
made and maintained.
(ix) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and
as per the records of the company, except VAT payable on Natural Gas
etc. Rs. 41,07,284/- for which liability created in the earlier years
(Note No. 28.19), the company has been generally regular in depositing
undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Income tax, Sales
tax, VAT, Custom duty, Excise duty and other statutory dues with the
appropriate authorities during the year.
(b) According to the information and explanation given to us there is
no material amount of the disputed tax etc. which are not deposited
with appropriate authority as at 31st March ''2012. However, the
Company has received certain demands and show cause notices for payment
of duty and penalty after the Balance Sheet date as detailed in Note
No. 28.11.02 (i) (a).
(x) As per the records of the Company, the Company has accumulated
Losses of Rs. 1130.02 Lakhs (Previous year f 1023.82 Lakhs) as on 31st
March, 2012 which are less than 50% of its net worth. The Company has
not incurred cash losses during the year, however it had incurred cash
losses in the immediately preceding financial year.
(xi) According to the information and explanations given to us the
Company has not defaulted in repayment of dues to the bank, and the
Company has not taken any loans from any financial institutions.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of security
by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
(xiii) The Company is not a chit fund/nidhi/mutual benefit/ society.
(xiv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities, debentures and
other investments.
(xv) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from bank
or financial institutions.
(xvi) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not obtained any term loan during the year.
(xvii) According to the information and explanations given to us, we
report that the funds raised on short-term basis have not been used for
long-term investment.
(xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares to parties
and Companies covered in the register maintained under section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956.
(xix) The Company has not issued any debentures during the year.
(xx) The Company has not raised any money by public issues during the
year.
(xxi) According to the information and explanations given to us no
fraud on or by the Company has been noticed or reported during year.
For L. K. Kejriwal & Co.
Chartered Accountants
Firm Registration No. 001368C
Sd/-
(CA. Samta Agarwal)
Place : Guwahati Partner
Date : 19.12.2012 M.No. 068296
Mar 31, 2011
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Assam Petrochemicals
Limited as at March 31, 2011 and also the Profit and Loss Account and
Cash Flow Statement of the Company for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards
generally accepted in India. These Standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatements. An audit
includes examining. On a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 as
amended by Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order, 2004
(together 'the Order'), issued by the Central Government of India in
terms of subsection (4A) of section 227 of the Companies Act; 1956, we
give in the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraph
4 of the said Order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the
audit;
(b) Subject to our comments in Paragraph 1 and 2 of the Annexure. in
our opinion, proper books of account, as required by law, have been
kept by the Company, so far as it appears from our examination of these
books, and proper returns, adequate for the purposes of our audit, have
been received from the branches with the exception of the Books of
Accounts of the wholly owned subsidiary Pragjyotish Fertiliser &
Chemicals Ltd.
(c) The Balance Sheet. Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of account;
(d) The Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement
dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting Standards referred
to in sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956;
(e) The provisions of Section 274(g) of the Companies Act, 1956
regarding 'Disqualifications of Directors', do not apply to this
company, being a Government Company. A Government Company is exempted
from the provisions of Section 274(g) vide Extra Ordinary Gazette
Notification no. G.S.R. 829 (E) dialed 21.10.2003 issued by the
Department of Company Affairs, Govt. of India.
(f) Subject to our comments in the Annexure to this report and Rs.
41,07,055/- being written back as provision no longer required, referred
in Notes on Accounts point no. 15. in our opinion, and to the best of
our information and according, to the explanations given to us, the said
accounts give the information required by the Companies Act, 1956, in
the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with
the accounting principles generally accepted in India;
i.. In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at March 31, 2011
ii. in the case of the Profit and Loss Account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date and
iii. in the case of the Cash Flow Statement, of the cash flows for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors' Report
(Referred to in Paragraph 3 of our Report of even date)
1. (a) The Company Kits no. maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed
assets. The management during the year has also not physically verified
the Fixed Assets of the Company, and as such material discrepancies, if
any could not be verified with financial records.
(b) Fixed Assets disposed off during the year were not substantial and,
therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption.
2. (a) According to the information & explanation given to us, the
management has not conducted physical verification of raw materials and
chemicals at the year end and has not maintained proper records of
these items during the year. Discrepancies if any, as compared to the
book records, could therefore not be verified.
(b) The physical verification of stores and spare parts has not been
conducted in a systematic manner and in our opinion; the procedures of
physical verification followed by the management are not reasonable and
adequate in relation to the size of the company and the nature of its
business. Moreover, proper records were not maintained of stores and
spares, and discrepancies, if any have not been dealt with the books of
account.
3. (a) Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to the
information and explanations given to us, the Company has granted
loans, secured or unsecured to/from companies, firms or other parties
covered in the register required to be maintained under Section 301 of
the Companies Act, 1956, However, the company has not maintained such a
register as required under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act
1956,
(b) There are two Companies covered in the register required to be
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, to whom the
Company has granted unsecured loans accumulated to Rs. 63.36 Lakhs.
This consists of loan to Assam Tea Corporation Ltd Rs. 25 Lakhs and
Pragjyotish fertilisers & Chemicals Ltd. Rs. 38.36 Lakhs.
(c) In our opinion, the Loan to Assam Tea Corporation Ltd was given
without any covenants as to repayment period, rate of interest etc. and
hence are prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company:
principal & interest has been not been regularly recovered and there
are overdue receivables. According to the information and explanations
given to us, Loan to Pragiyotish Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd was given
without any covenants as to repayment period, rate of interest etc and
hence are prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company.
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, there are no contracts and arrangements referred to in
Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 entered into during the year
that need to be entered in the register maintained under that Section.
Accordingly, sub clause (b) of Sub-para (v) of para 4 of the Order is
not applicable to the Company for the current year.
5. The company does not have an adequate internal control procedure
commensurate 'with the size of the company and the nature of its
business, for the purchase of Inventory and Fixed Assets and for the
sale of goods and services. During the course of our audit, the
following observations were noted by as:
a. Fixed Assets
Despite previous observations by Statutory Auditors the Fixed Assets
Register has not been completed. A firm was commissioned in 2007 for
the same purpose and has yet to submit a final report that would be
incorporated into the financial system.
b. Inventory (Including Stock of Raw Materials and Chemicals Rs.
2,67,80,876) Stores & Spare parts Rs. 6,01,57,653 A random physical
check of some 'catalysis' show high value items (including imported)
appearing in stores ledger since 1996 and are physically lying in the
storage area, Inventory records including priced stores ledger is
maintained manually No physical verification has been carried out for
several years.
There appear to be a large number of obsolete and/or slow moving items
which are continued to be carried in the Inventory. No classification
of inventory has been done to evaluate obsolete/slow moving items.
c. Advances to suppliers
The company has paid advances amounting to Rs. 1,12,81,995/- to several
suppliers in earlier Financial Years for various goods & services which
have either not been rendered/supplied and/or not been
rendered/supplied within the stipulated timeframe in the Work Orders.
The extent to which these advances are recoverable could not be
determined by us and hence we are unable to form an opinion on their
impact in the Profit & Loss Account for the year ended 31st March 2011.
In our opinion, suitable provisions/write-offs should be made in the
financial statements after such review.
6. The company has not accepted any deposit from the public.
7. In our opinion, the company does not have an internal audit system
that is commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business. In our opinion the financial accounting system together with
the internal control system is not commensurate with the nature and
size of the business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the hooks of account maintained by the
company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for the
maintenance of cost records under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies
Act,. 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained.
9. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
the basis of our examination of the books of account, the Company has
during the year, been generally regular in depositing with the
appropriate authorities, undisputed statutory dues, including Provident
Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, Income Tax, Sales Tax,
Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other
material statutory dues.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
the basis of our examination of the books of account, no undisputed
amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax, Wealth Tax,
Service Tax, Custom Duty. Excise Duty, Cess were in arrears, as at
March 31, 2011, for a period of more than six months front the date
they became payable.
10. The Company has incurred Rs. 10,23,82,288/- losses in this
financial year. There is no accumulated loss coming from earlier
financial year.
11. According to the information and explanations given to us, and
based on checks carried out by us, the Company did not have any
borrowing from a financial institution or bank or debenture holders and
hence clause 4(xi) of the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 (as
amended) is not applicable.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
Company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. In our opinion and according to information and explanations given
to us, the Company is not a chit fund or a nidhi/mutual benefit
fund/society. Therefore the provisions of sub-para (xiii) of para 4 of
the Order are not applicable to the Company.
14. The Company is not dealing or trading in shares, securities,
debentures and other Investments. Therefore the provisions of sub-para
(xiv) of Para 4 of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
15. In our opinion and according to information and explanations
provided to us, the Company has not provided guarantees for loans taken
by others from banks and financial Institutions.
16. The company did not have any term loan outstanding during the
year.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us. and on
an overall examination of the Balance Sheet of the Company, funds
raised on short-term basis have, prima facie, not been used during the
year for making long-term investments.
18. According to the information and explanations given to us, during
the year the Company has not made any preferential allotment of shares
to panics and companies covered in the Register maintained under
Section 301 of the Companies Act. 1956.
19. The Company has not raised any monies by way of issue of
debentures. Therefore, the provisions of sub-para (xix) of para 4 of
the Order are not applicable to the Company.
20. The Company has not made any public issue during the year.
21. According to information and explanations given to us and based on
audit procedures performed and representations obtained from the
management, we report that no material fraud on or by the Company , has
been noticed or reported during the year under audit.
For S. Ganguli & Associates
Chartered Accountants
FRN: 302192E
CA. Prosenjit Kumar De
Partner
Membership No. : 053952
Place : Guwahati
Date: 28th September, 2011
Mar 31, 2010
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of Assam petrochemicals
ltd. as at 31st March, 2010, and also the Profit and Loss account and
cash Flow statement of the Company for the year ended on that date
annexed thereto. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standard
generally accepted in India. These standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by the management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
3. As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order, 2003 as
amended by Companies (Auditor's Report) (Amendment) Order. 2004
(together with the Order"), issued by the Central Government of India
in terms of sub-section (4A) of Section 227 of the Companies Act 1956,
we give the Annexure, a statement on the matters specified in paragraph
4 of the said order.
4. Further to our comments in the Annexure referred to in paragraph 3
above, we report that:
(a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, were necessary for the purpose of the
audit;
(b) Subject to our comments in Paragraph 1 and 2 of the Annexure, in
our opinion, proper books of accounts, as required by law, have been
kept by the Company, so far as it appears from our examination of these
books, and proper returns, adequate for the purpose of our audit have
been received from the branches with the exception of the Books of
Accounts of the wholly owned subsidiary Pragyotish Fertilizer &
Chemicals Ltd.
(c) The Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report are in agreement with the books of
Accounts.
(d) The Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss account and Cash Flow
Statement dealt with by this report comply with the Accounting
Standards referred to in Sub-section (3C) of Section 211 of the
Companies Act, 1956,
(e) The provisions of Section 274 (g) of the Companies act, 1956
regarding 'Disqualification of Directors', do not apply to this
company, being a Government Company. A Government Company is exempted
from the provisions of Section 274(g) vide Extra Ordinary Gazette
Notification no. GSR. 829 (E) dated 21.10.2003 issued by the Department
of Company Affairs, Govt. of India.
(f) Subject to our comments in the Annexure to this report in our
opinion, and to the best of our information and ac- cording to the
explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act. 1956, in the manner so required and give
true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India.;
i. in the case of the Balance Sheet of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2010
ii. in the case of the Profit and loss account, of the profit for the
year ended on that date; and
iii. in the case of the Cash flow Statement, of the cash flow for the
year ended on that date.
Annexure to the Auditors' Report (Refer to in Paragraph 3 of our Report
of even date)
1. (a) The Company has rot maintained proper records showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of the fixed
assets. The management during the year has also not physically verified
the Fixed Assets of the company, and as such, material discrepancies,
if any could not be verified with the financial records. (b) Fixed
assets disposed off during the year were not substantial and,
therefore, do not affect the going concern assumption,
2. (a) According to the information and explanation given to us, the
management has not conducted physical verification of finished stock,
stock-in-progress, raw materials and chemicals at the year end, and has
not maintained proper records of there items during the year.
Discrepancies if any, as compared to tie book records, could therefore
not be verified.
(b) The physical verification of store and spare parts has not been
conducted in a systematic manner and in our opinion, the procedure of
physical verification followed by the management are not reasonable and
adequate in relation to size of the company and the nature of its
business. Moreover, proper records were not maintained of stores and
spares, and discrepancies, if any have not been dealt with the books of
account.
3. (a) Based on the audit procedures applied by us and according to the
information and explanations given to us, the company has granted
loans, secured or unsecured to/from companies, firms or other parties
covered in the register required to be maintained under section 301 of
the Companies act, 1956. However, the company has not maintained such a
register as required under the relevant provisions of the Companies
Act.
(b) There are two companies covered in the register required to be
maintained under Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956, to whom the
company has granted unsecured ban aggregating to Rs. 85.36 lakhs. This
consists of loan to Assam Tea Corporation Ltd Rs. 50.00 Lakhs and
Pragjyotjsh Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. Rs. 35.36 Lakhs.
(c) In our opinion, Loan to Assam Tea corporation Ltd. was given
without any covenants as to repayment period, rate of interest etc. And
hence are prima facie prejudicial to the interest ot the company:
principal and interest has been not been regularly recovered and there
ere overdue receivable. According to the information and explanation
given to us, loan to Pragjyotish Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. was given
without any covenants as to repayment period, rate of interest etc, And
hence are prima facie prejudicial to the interest of the company
4. In our opinion and according to the information and explanation
given to us , there are no contracts and arrangements referred to in
Section 301 of the Companies act. 1956 entered into during the year
that need to be entered in the Register maintained under that section.
Accordingly, sub-clause (b) of sub para (v) of para 4 of the Order is
not applicable to the company for the current year.
5. The company does not have an adequate internal control procedure
commensurate with the size of the company and of the nature of its
business, for the purpose of Inventory and Fixed assets and for sale of
goods and services. During the course of our audit, the following
observations were noted by us:
a. Fixed Assets1 Despite previous observations by Statutory auditors
the fixed assets Register has not been completed. A firm was
commissioned in 2007 for the same purposes and has yet to submit a
final report that would be incorporated into the financial system.
b. Inventory (Including stock of Raw Materials and Chemicals Rs-
27147068/-) stores &. Spares Rs. 5,95,19,723/-.
A random physical check of some 'catalysts' show they were imported
high value items appearing in store ledger since 1996 imported from
suppliers including overseas suppliers) and are lying in drums in the
storage area. Inventory records including priced store ledger is
maintained manually. Mo physical verifications has teen carried out (or
several years.
There appear to be large number of obsolete and/or slow
moving items which are continued to be carried in the inventory. No
classification of inventory has been done to evaluate obsolete/slow
moving items.
c. Advances to suppliers
The company has paid advances amounting to Rs. 1,35,90,000/- to several
suppliers for various goods and services which either not been
rendered/supplied and/or not been rendered/supplied within the
stipulated time frame in the work orders. The extent to which these
advances are recoverable could not be determined by us and hence we are
unable to form an opinion on their impact in the Profit and loss
Account for the yearended 31st March 2010.
6. The company has not accepted any deposit from the public.
7. In our opinion, the company does not have an internal audit system
that is commensurate with the size of the company and the nature of its
business, In our opinion the financial accounting system together with
internal control system is not commensurate with the nature and size of
the business.
8. We have broadly reviewed the books of accounts maintained by the
company pursuant to the Rules made by the Central Government for
maintenance of cost records under section 209 (1) (d) of the Companies
Act, 1956 and are of the opinion that prima facie, the prescribed
accounts and records have been made and maintained.
9. (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
the basis of our examination of the books of accounts, the company has,
during the year, been generally regular in depositing with the
appropriate authorities, undisputed statutory dues, including Provident
Fund, Investor Education and Protection Fund, income Tax, Sales Tax,
Wealth Tax, Service Tax, Custom Duty, Excise Duty, Cess and any other
material statutory dues.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and on
the basis of our examination of the books of account, no undisputed
amounts payable in respect of Income Tax, Sales Tax. Wealth Tax,
Service Tax, Custom Duty. Excise Duty, Cess were in arrears as at March
31.2010, for a period of more than six month, six month from the date
they become payable.
10. The company does not have any accumulated losses at the end of the
financial year and has not incurred cash losses in the financial year
and in the financial year immediately proceeding such financial year.
11. According to the information and explanation given to us, and
based on checks carried out by us, the company did not have any
borrowing from a financial institutions or banks or debenture holders
and hence clause 4 (ix) of the Companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003
(as Amended) is not applicable.
12. According to the information and explanations given to us, the
company has not granted loans and advances on the basis of security by
way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
13. In our opinion and according to information and explanation given
to us, the company is not a Chit Funds or a Nidhi/mutual benefit
fund/society Therefore the provisions of sub-para (xiii) of para 4 of
the Order are not applicable to the Company.
14. According to the information and explanation given to us, Subject
to the following.
a. Investment in Mutual funds of Bharati Axa Regular Return Rs.
45,00,000
b. Investments Mutual fund of SBI Regular Floater Rs. 4500000 Which in
our opinion is not in the normal course of business. The company is not
dealing or trading inn shares, securities, debentures and other
investments. Therefore the provisions of sub-para (xiv) of para 4 of
the Order are not applicable to the company.
15. In our opinion and according to information and explanation given
to us, the company has not provided guarantees for loan taken by others
from banks and other financial institutions.
16. The Company did not have any term loan outstanding during the
year.
17. According to the information and explanations given to us, and on
an overall examination of the Balance sheet of the Company, fund raised
on short-term basis have, prima facie, not Seen used during the year
for making long term investments.
18. According to the information and explanation given to us, during
the year the Company has hot made any preferential allotment or shares
to parties and companies covered in the register maintained under
Section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956.
19. The Company has not raised any monies by way of issue of
debentures. Therefore, the provisions of Sub para (xix) of para 4 of
the Order are not applicable to the company.
20. The Company has not made any public issue during the year
21. According to information and explanations given to us and based on
audit procedures performed and representations obtained from the
management, we report that no material fraud on or by the company, has
been noticed or reported during the year under audit.
For M/s. S. Ganguli & Associates
Chartered Accountants
Sd/-
(CA. D.P. SAHA)
Partner
(M. No. 003935)
Place: Guwahati
Date: October 11, 2010
Mar 31, 2002
We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of ASSAM PETROCHEMICALS
LIMITED as at 31st March, 2002 and also the Profit & Loss Account of
the Company for the year ended on that date, annexed thereto. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those Standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
As required by the Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report)
Order, 1988, issued by the Central Government of India in terms of sub-
I section (4 A) of section 227 of the Companies Act, 1 1956, we enclose
in the Annexure-I a statement on 1 the matters specified in paragraphs
4 and 5 of the said order.
Further to our comments in the Annexure-I referred to above, and our
observations in the Annexure-ll, we report that:
i) We have obtained all the information and explanations, which to the
best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our
audit.
ii) In our opinion, proper books of accounts as required by the law
have been kept by the company so far as appears from our examination of
those books.
iii) The Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account dealt with by this
report are in agreement with the books of account.
iv) In our opinion, the Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Account dealt
with by this report comply with the accounting standards referred to in
sub- section (3 C) of section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956.
v) In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to
the explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information
required by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and give
a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles
generally accepted in India.
(a) in the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as at 31st March, 2002; and
(b) in the case of the Profit & Loss Account, of the loss for the year
ended on that date.
ANNEXURE-1
Report under Manufacturing and Other Companies (Auditors Report) order,
1988,
i) The company has maintained Fixed Assets Register showing particulars
including quantative details and situation of fixed assets. No physical
verification of the Fixed Assets except furniture & fixtures and
hospital equipments, was conducted during the year under audit. No
reconcilation of item wise original cost and depreciation to date as
per fixed asset register with the aggregate value as appearing in the
books of accounts has been prepared.
ii) There has been no revaluation of Fixed Assets during the year.
iii) The physical verification of Stock of Finished Goods was conducted
by the management periodically. The physical verification of stores,
spare parts and raw materials was not conducted by the company during
the year under audit.
iv) In our opinion and according to the information and explanations
given to us, the procedure of physical verification for the finished
goods followed by the management was reasonable and adequate in
relation to the size of the company and nature of its business.
v) No material discrepancies were noticed on physical verification of
finished goods as compared to book records. However, pending
reconciliation of stores, spare parts and raw- materials as stated in
paragraph (iii) above, we are unable to comment upon the discrepancies
in stock of stores, spare parts and raw materials.
vi) In our opinion and on the basis of our examination, the valuation
of stores, spare parts and raw-materials is fair and proper in
accordance with normally accepted accounting principles and is on the
same basis as in preceeding year. Finished Goods were valued at selling
price or cost price whichever is lower.
vii) The Company has not taken any loan from companies, firms or other
parties listed in the Registers maintained under Section 301 and 370
(1-C) of the Companies Act, 1956.
Provisions of section 370 of the Companies Act, 1956 are not applicable
to a company with effect from 31st October, 1998.
viii) The company has not granted any loans secured or unsecured to
companies firms or other parties i listed in the Register maintained
under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956 and/or to companies under
the same management as defined under sub-section (1B) of Section 370 ii
of the Companies Act, 1956. Provisions of section 370 of the Companies
Act, 1956 are ii not applicable to a company with effect from 31st
October, 1998.
ix) Loans and Advances in the nature of loan given to employees have
been repaid regularly i together with interest thereon as stipulated or
rescheduled.
x) The company has written procedures for internal controls for
purchase of stores, raw-materials including components, plant &
machinery, equipments and other assets, and from our examination of
books of accounts we are of the opinion that the internal control
procedure for purchase of stores and raw-materials including components
and for purchase of plant and machinery and other assets and for sale
of goods seems to be adequate.
xi) We have been informed that during the year no transactions of
purchase of goods and materials i and sale of goods, materials and
services, were made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered
in the register maintained under section 301 of the Companies Act, 1956
as aggregating during the year to Rs. 50,000/- or more in respect of
each party.
xii) During the year under review, the company has determined stores
and materials worth Rs. 3,12,515.53 as unserviceable or damaged as
well as items not moved for a period of over 10 years and charged to
consumption of stores and spares as per standing approval of Board of
Directors.
xiii) The company has not accepted any deposits from Public within the
meaning of Section 58A of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Rules framed
thereunder.
xiv) As informed to us the company does not have any realisable by
products. Reasonable records have been maintained by the company for
the sale and disposal of realisable scrap.
xv) The company is conducting internal audit by the personnel in
addition to regular duties in accounts Deptt., who gave their report
annually. The system adopted by the company is not commensurate with
its size and nature of business and required further strengthening.
xvi) According to the information given to us, the company is required
to maintain cost records under Section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act,
1956.
xvii) Provident Fund dues have generally been regularly deposited with
the appropriate authorities.
xviii) According to the information and explanations given to us, no
undisputed statutory dues were outstanding for a period of more than
six months as on 31st March, 2002 from the date of becoming payable.
xix) According to the information and explanation given to us, in our
opinion, no personal expenses have been charged to Profit & Loss
Account other than those payable under contractual obligations or in
accordance with generally accepted business practices duly authorised.
xx) The company is not a sick industrial company within the meaning of
Clause (O) of sub-section (1) of Section 3 of Sick Industrial Companies
(Special Provisions) Act, 1985.
For Choudhury & Hazarika
Chartered Accountants
Sd/-
(K.N. Choudhury)
Partner
Place : Guwahati
Dated : 3rd June, 2002
Disclaimer: This is 3rd Party content/feed, viewers are requested to use their discretion and conduct proper diligence before investing, GoodReturns does not take any liability on the genuineness and correctness of the information in this article